<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Oklahoma Shooters Association - 2nd Amendment Legal & Political]]></title>
		<link>https://www.okshooters.com/</link>
		<description>Discussions relating to Gun Laws, Political happenings relating to firearms, and 2nd amendment impact happenings.</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:47:37 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>House bill would mandate guns with 007-style smart tech</title>
			<link>https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?175496-House-bill-would-mandate-guns-with-007-style-smart-tech&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:57:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9239401/House_bill_would_mandate_guns_with_007_style_smart_tech?taxonomyId=128&pageNumber=2 
 
Others smart gun technologies include fingerprint recognition through infrared readers and the use of RFID radio chips that, like a car, only enables a gun when a...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9239401/House_bill_would_mandate_guns_with_007_style_smart_tech?taxonomyId=128&amp;pageNumber=2" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.computerworld.com/s/artic...8&amp;pageNumber=2</a><br />
<br />
Others smart gun technologies include fingerprint recognition through infrared readers and the use of RFID radio chips that, like a car, only enables a gun when a person carrying the chip is holding it. Technologists developing smart guns say multiple users, even thousands of them, could have their unique identities programmed into a weapon.<br />
<br />
Biometrics technology proponents readily admit that their systems can be thwarted, and no single technology or piece of legislation will solve the gun safety problem. There are also logistical issues. For example, what if the person carrying the gun forgets his or her RFID chip and can't operate the weapon?<br />
<br />
In response to the school shooting in Newtown, Conn. last December, President Barrack Obama issued an executive order directing the National Institute of Justice to conduct a study on the state of various smart gun technologies.<br />
<br />
Safe Gun Technology (SGTi) co-founder Charlie Miller believes his company's technology could have stopped Adam Lanza from killing 26 in Newtown, Conn. last December.<br />
<br />
Columbus, Ga.-based SGTi's technology uses fingerprint recognition through an infrared reader. The biometrics reader enables three other physical mechanisms that control the trigger, the firing pin and the gun hammer.<br />
<br />
Like other smart gun technology companies, however, SGTi has found itself with a lack of funding to produce a product. In fact, current prototypes of some smart gun technologies are based on 10-year-old microprocessors because of a lack of funds, according Donald H. Sebastian, senior vice president for research and development at New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT).<br />
<br />
A half dozen campus police at the NJIT already carry smart guns developed on campus that prevent unauthorized use by disabling the trigger mechanism through Dynamic Grip Recognition technology. &quot;We have found no interest on the part of gun manufacturers in commercializing any aspect of user-authenticating weapons,&quot; Sebastian said in a December interview with Computerworld.<br />
<br />
In addition to requiring handguns to be fitted with smart gun technology, the Personalized Handgun Safety Act of 2013 would:<br />
<br />
-Authorize grants, to be administered through the National Institute of Justice, for further development and improvement of personalized handgun technology.<br />
<br />
-Direct the Consumer Product Safety Commission to create a safety standard for personalized handguns that all newly manufactured handguns must meet.<br />
<br />
-Fund the retrofitting of older guns through the Asset Forfeiture Fund at the Department of Justice (DOJ). Cash confiscated by the DOJ and proceeds from the sale of other confiscated property is deposited into the fund.<br />
<br />
-Hold gun manufacturers liable if they produce guns that do not meet the CPSC safety standard two years after the passage of the bill.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="https://www.okshooters.com/forumdisplay.php?27-2nd-Amendment-Legal-amp-Political"><![CDATA[2nd Amendment Legal & Political]]></category>
			<dc:creator>jakerz</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?175496-House-bill-would-mandate-guns-with-007-style-smart-tech</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Firearm Confiscation In Moore</title>
			<link>https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?175478-Firearm-Confiscation-In-Moore&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 15:30:50 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Hi, 
 
Some troubling news.  A Coworkers brother in law was retrieving his firearms from his safe in Moore at his destroyed house.  National Guard and LEO of some type saw him and confiscated his rifles.  They would not give a receipt.  The homeowner suggested just putting them back in his safe but...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hi,<br />
<br />
Some troubling news.  A Coworkers brother in law was retrieving his firearms from his safe in Moore at his destroyed house.  National Guard and LEO of some type saw him and confiscated his rifles.  They would not give a receipt.  The homeowner suggested just putting them back in his safe but they did not allow it.<br />
<br />
He had ID on him and was at his place of residence.<br />
<br />
I did not witness this but heard from my coworker. This is all the information I have.  If I hear anymore I will post.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="https://www.okshooters.com/forumdisplay.php?27-2nd-Amendment-Legal-amp-Political"><![CDATA[2nd Amendment Legal & Political]]></category>
			<dc:creator>skycitadel</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?175478-Firearm-Confiscation-In-Moore</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Saw this posted today...</title>
			<link>https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?175437-Saw-this-posted-today&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 01:24:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Saw this posted on a social media site today.  I was in the military for quite a while.  And a lot of this is pretty dang scary.... 
 
http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/302521p.pdf</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Saw this posted on a social media site today.  I was in the military for quite a while.  And a lot of this is pretty dang scary....<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/302521p.pdf" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/c...df/302521p.pdf</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="https://www.okshooters.com/forumdisplay.php?27-2nd-Amendment-Legal-amp-Political"><![CDATA[2nd Amendment Legal & Political]]></category>
			<dc:creator>jdgabbard</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?175437-Saw-this-posted-today</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Definition of Militia</title>
			<link>https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?175386-Definition-of-Militia&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 05:09:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[*mi·li·tia noun \m&#601;-&#712;li-sh&#601;\*: 
 
An assembly of armed "People" (Citizen Patriots with or without formal training), simultaneously exercising the rights granted to them by their creator and expressly protected by the First and Second Amendments to the United States Constitution, organized as...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><b>mi·li·tia noun \m&#601;-&#712;li-sh&#601;\</b>:<br />
<br />
An assembly of armed &quot;People&quot; (Citizen Patriots with or without formal training), simultaneously exercising the rights granted to them by their creator and expressly protected by the First and Second Amendments to the United States Constitution, organized as envisioned by the Founding Father's of America, for the protection of the Free State, from any and all threats, foreign or domestic.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="https://www.okshooters.com/forumdisplay.php?27-2nd-Amendment-Legal-amp-Political"><![CDATA[2nd Amendment Legal & Political]]></category>
			<dc:creator>Freedom@AnyCost</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?175386-Definition-of-Militia</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>So Snoop Dogg made an anti gun video.</title>
			<link>https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?175383-So-Snoop-Dogg-made-an-anti-gun-video&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 03:46:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[What's next, Colonel Sanders coming out against fried chicken??? 
 
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqo9gPxT6A8]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>What's next, Colonel Sanders coming out against fried chicken???<br />
<br />
<br />

<iframe class="restrain" title="YouTube video player" width="640" height="390" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/jqo9gPxT6A8?wmode=opaque" frameborder="0"></iframe>
</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="https://www.okshooters.com/forumdisplay.php?27-2nd-Amendment-Legal-amp-Political"><![CDATA[2nd Amendment Legal & Political]]></category>
			<dc:creator>farmerbyron</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?175383-So-Snoop-Dogg-made-an-anti-gun-video</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ruger Eyes Texas for Big New Plant</title>
			<link>https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?175377-Ruger-Eyes-Texas-for-Big-New-Plant&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 00:52:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Ruger  Eyes Texas for Big New Plant Carolinas Also in the Running; No Changes Seen in Newport (http://www.vnews.com/home/6018600-95/sturm-ruger-eyes-texas-for-big-new-plant) 
 
Newport — Sturm, Ruger & Co. Inc. plans to expand and create 500 to 700 new jobs, the company’s president and CEO...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.vnews.com/home/6018600-95/sturm-ruger-eyes-texas-for-big-new-plant" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Ruger  Eyes Texas for Big New Plant Carolinas Also in the Running; No Changes Seen in Newport</a><br />
<br />
<i>Newport — Sturm, Ruger &amp; Co. Inc. plans to expand and create 500 to 700 new jobs, the company’s president and CEO announced last week. But that expansion won’t be in New England.<br />
<br />
Michael O. Fifer told the firm’s shareholders at their annual meeting last week that company is looking for an existing 250,000-square-foot building, and Fifer said he hopes Texas Gov. Rick Perry will give it to him.<br />
<br />
Fifer said Tuesday he planned to meet with Perry this weekend at the National Rifle Association convention in Houston to ask the governor for a building suitable for a plant to manufacture new lines of products.<br />
<br />
“I wouldn’t be surprised if he does it,” the Fifer said.<br />
<br />
Ruger, which is headquartered in Southport, Conn., with a workforce of 2,100 and manufacturing facilities in Newport and Prescott, Ariz., plans to spend about $30 million on the expansion, and the company has narrowed the search for the facility to North Carolina, South Carolina and Texas.</i><br />
<br />
<b><font size="6">Why not Oklahoma?</font></b></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="https://www.okshooters.com/forumdisplay.php?27-2nd-Amendment-Legal-amp-Political"><![CDATA[2nd Amendment Legal & Political]]></category>
			<dc:creator>Raoul Duke</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?175377-Ruger-Eyes-Texas-for-Big-New-Plant</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>New Jersey respecting their citizens rights.</title>
			<link>https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?175264-New-Jersey-respecting-their-citizens-rights&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 14:55:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=d7d_1368856861</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=d7d_1368856861" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=d7d_1368856861</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="https://www.okshooters.com/forumdisplay.php?27-2nd-Amendment-Legal-amp-Political"><![CDATA[2nd Amendment Legal & Political]]></category>
			<dc:creator>uncle money bags</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?175264-New-Jersey-respecting-their-citizens-rights</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Colorado sheriffs sue to block new gun-control laws</title>
			<link>https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?175252-Colorado-sheriffs-sue-to-block-new-gun-control-laws&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 05:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[CO Sheriffs sue to block new gun-control laws (http://news.yahoo.com/colorado-sheriffs-sue-block-gun-control-laws-014650482.html) 
 
By Keith Coffman 
DENVER (Reuters) - A group of Colorado county sheriffs, angry about two new state gun control laws passed in the wake of last year's mass shootings...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/colorado-sheriffs-sue-block-gun-control-laws-014650482.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">CO Sheriffs sue to block new gun-control laws</a><br />
<br />
By Keith Coffman<br />
DENVER (Reuters) - A group of Colorado county sheriffs, angry about two new state gun control laws passed in the wake of last year's mass shootings in Connecticut and Colorado, filed a federal lawsuit on Friday seeking to block the laws from going into effect.<br />
<br />
The two laws, passed by the state's Democratic-controlled legislature with scant Republican support, ban ammunition magazines that hold more than 15 rounds and require background checks for all private gun sales and transfers.<br />
<br />
All but 10 of the state's 64 county sheriffs signed on to the suit, filed in U.S. District Court in Denver. In their complaint, the sheriffs allege the new laws, which go into effect July 1, severely restrict citizens' constitutional right to own and bear arms.<br />
<br />
The sheriffs, who in Colorado are elected, also complained that they were operating under tight budgets and did not have the money or manpower to enforce the new laws.<br />
<br />
&quot;They (the sheriffs) cannot expend these resources to conduct investigations that would be necessary to monitor compliance,&quot; the lawsuit said.<br />
<br />
The bills were introduced in response to a shooting spree that killed 12 people at a suburban Denver movie theater last July and the slaying of 20 children and six adults at an elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, in December.<br />
<br />
Connecticut and New York also have passed stricter gun laws in the wake of the shootings. The National Rifle Association, the powerful U.S. gun lobby, has announced plans to challenge the new gun control laws in all three states.<br />
<br />
REASONABLE SAFETY MEASURES<br />
<br />
Democratic state Senator Mary Hodge, who sponsored the magazine-limit bill, blasted the sheriffs and said the restrictions were reasonable public-safety measures.<br />
<br />
&quot;We can't just sit by and do nothing while first-graders and moviegoers are being mowed down in one fell swoop with weapons equipped with large-capacity magazines,&quot; Hodge said in a statement.<br />
<br />
Joining the sheriffs in the lawsuit are a number of gun-rights organizations and a disabled gun owners group, who say that magazine limits would restrict their ability to defend themselves in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which bars discrimination against the disabled.<br />
<br />
&quot;Disabilities make it difficult to quickly change magazines under the stress of a home invasion,&quot; the lawsuit said.<br />
Governor John Hickenlooper, a Democrat who signed the bills into law, is named as the defendant in the lawsuit. His office had no immediate comment.<br />
<br />
Colorado Attorney General John Suthers, a Republican, said in a statement that his role &quot;will be to get court rulings on the legality of various aspects of the legislation as expeditiously as possible.&quot;<br />
<br />
&quot;Colorado citizens, and law-abiding gun owners in particular, deserve such clarification,&quot; said Suthers, who did not publicly oppose the two bills when they were debated in the legislature.<br />
<br />
Separately, a Colorado pro-gun group, the Basic Freedom Defense Fund, said it was circulating a petition to recall the president of the state Senate, Democrat John Morse, because of his support for gun control measures.<br />
<br />
Morse, a former police officer, said he would likely face a recall election later this year as a result.<br />
<br />
&quot;If they are successful in removing the Senate president in Colorado, it will have a chilling effect on anyone who takes them on but if they fail they will be exposed for the paper tiger they should be,&quot; he said.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="https://www.okshooters.com/forumdisplay.php?27-2nd-Amendment-Legal-amp-Political"><![CDATA[2nd Amendment Legal & Political]]></category>
			<dc:creator>rawhide</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?175252-Colorado-sheriffs-sue-to-block-new-gun-control-laws</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mayfest- Surrender your rights!</title>
			<link>https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?175229-Mayfest-Surrender-your-rights!&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 02:09:47 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Surrender your 4th Amendment Right if you want to attend Mayfest!!   
 
http://www.newson6.com/story/22286561/security-tighter-at-this-years-tulsa-mayfest 
 
TULSA, Oklahoma - 
 
As thousands of people head downtown for Mayfest, Tulsa police are taking extra steps to keep visitors safe. 
 
Officers...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Surrender your 4th Amendment Right if you want to attend Mayfest!!  <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.newson6.com/story/22286561/security-tighter-at-this-years-tulsa-mayfest" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.newson6.com/story/2228656...-tulsa-mayfest</a><br />
<br />
TULSA, Oklahoma -<br />
<br />
As thousands of people head downtown for Mayfest, Tulsa police are taking extra steps to keep visitors safe.<br />
<br />
Officers say they've increased security this year. Visitors aren't allowed to bring ice chests or backpacks, and <b><font color="#FF0000">if you bring a large bag, be ready to have it searched.</font></b><br />
<br />
Police say, as you prepare to head out, remember: less is more.<br />
<br />
&quot;We like to tell people, if you don't have to carry a purse, don't give anybody an opportunity to commit a crime,&quot; said Cpl. Chris Bauer.<br />
<br />
Police are encouraging visitors to speak up if they see anything suspicious.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="https://www.okshooters.com/forumdisplay.php?27-2nd-Amendment-Legal-amp-Political"><![CDATA[2nd Amendment Legal & Political]]></category>
			<dc:creator>DirtyDawg</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?175229-Mayfest-Surrender-your-rights!</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>California signs microstamping into law</title>
			<link>https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?175222-California-signs-microstamping-into-law&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:55:06 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>http://www.gunpoliticsny.com/?p=8457 
 
http://oag.ca.gov/firearms/infobuls 
 
 
:nolike:</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.gunpoliticsny.com/?p=8457" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.gunpoliticsny.com/?p=8457</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://oag.ca.gov/firearms/infobuls" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://oag.ca.gov/firearms/infobuls</a><br />
<br />
<br />
:nolike:</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="https://www.okshooters.com/forumdisplay.php?27-2nd-Amendment-Legal-amp-Political"><![CDATA[2nd Amendment Legal & Political]]></category>
			<dc:creator>Spata</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?175222-California-signs-microstamping-into-law</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>2nd Amendment Belongs Only in History Books Alongside Extinct Militias?</title>
			<link>https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?175175-2nd-Amendment-Belongs-Only-in-History-Books-Alongside-Extinct-Militias&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 06:08:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[That is the reasoning often sighted by the left wing of "The Party" anyway. The form of Militia that existed at the time is now extinct, so too should be the 2nd Amendment according to the "Logic".  
 
Perhaps the same logic should be applied to the 1st, how long has it been since "Speech" has been...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>That is the reasoning often sighted by the left wing of &quot;The Party&quot; anyway. The form of Militia that existed at the time is now extinct, so too should be the 2nd Amendment according to the &quot;Logic&quot;. <br />
<br />
Perhaps the same logic should be applied to the 1st, how long has it been since &quot;Speech&quot; has been conducted utilizing a printing &quot;Press&quot;. Look at all the violence and death resulting from modern high capacity communication of hate speech. Our founders never imagined modern communication technology. They would be horrified to see the worldwide carnage it has caused (Libya attack because of one man's video for example).<br />
<br />
Same with &quot;Assembly&quot;, with modern technology people don't need to assemble in large groups to communicate, or anything else for that matter. They can watch it on TV from the safety of the home (where it will be free of anything &quot;Offensive, Dangerous or Hurtful&quot;). Besides, it is dangerous to have more than TEN people assembled in one place. Our founders never could have imagined a population of 300 million + people! They would be horrified to see the number of people trampled to death and burned alive as a result of too many people assembled in a single location. If we could save even one life...<br />
<br />
Isn't it interesting, we ALL recognize how childish (illogical) this logic is when applied to the first Amendment, but somehow it has a foot hold on the Second for many people. Are they stupid or is it something else? <br />
<br />
While for some, it may indeed be the former, for most it is the latter. When everyone around you agrees 2+2=5, so too will you. For example, how many of us believe Pit Bulls (with their &quot;Lock Jaws&quot;) are INHERENTLY more dangerous than other breeds of similar size or strength or that Marijuana (the &quot;Gateway&quot; drug) prohibition is a good idea? <br />
<br />
News flash, 2+2=4, Pit Bulls are no more &quot;Inherently&quot; dangerous than any other breed of equal size and power, and Marijuana prohibition (the entire drug war for that matter) is every bit as bad an idea as was alcohol prohibition for the EXACT same reasons. <br />
<br />
We believe these things for the same reason Orwell's characters believed 2+2=5 in the novel 1984 - because that is the silly logical fallacy we have been taught all our lives. As with any good logical fallacy, there are elements of truth mixed in with all the BS which is what makes the logical fallacy so easy to believe. In other words, we have been trained to believe correlation = causation which is rarely ever true. <br />
<br />
We even tell our children, &quot;Do / believe it because I said so.&quot; What are we teaching them from a very young age? To accept direction from authority without question and to ignore contradictory information. Your parents, and later on, the leaders of your social groups and the Government know what is best for you so there is no need to learn to think and process information on your own. <br />
<br />
Sure, your niece may have been attacked by your brothers Pit Bull while your he was was zoned out on the couch high on weed, but do a few anecdotal stories played over and over again in the media make the overall narrative true? If so, maybe the Second Amendment Abolitionists are right....... But the correct answer is hell no. People believe these ridiculous things because we are socialized from a young age to do so. If you have fallen for the Pit Bull or Drug War nonsense, you now understand how &quot;They&quot; can believe all this gun control nonsense. I know some of you are reading this and trying to come up with a rebuttal on Pit Bulls and/or the Drug War comparisons, but it's time to let go of the dogma and snap into reality. If you can't do it, how can you expect them to? <br />
<br />
With that knowledge, perhaps better methods can be developed to eliminate the ignorance behind the gun control movement. One thing that has been proven not to ever work, name calling and cheap personal shots. Those play well for the choir, but get us nowhere when it comes to winning over the minds potential converts - logical people who listen to facts and reason over anecdotal stories rich with emotion but void of logic. <br />
<br />
One last tidbit for all the drug war crusaders out there, this little gem (The Drug War) is what created much of the violence in our society that is now being blamed on firearms (exactly same as alcohol prohibition resulting in 1934 legislation). It also socialized us all to believe violating &quot;Their&quot; constitutional rights was okay because it makes us safer. It justified massive increases in the criminal justice system for what amounts to political crimes (victimless crime is a clever euphemism for political crime). The monster we created and fed with our blind support, tacit complicity and blatant disregard for the Constitution when it came to &quot;Those People&quot; is now slowly but surely being redirected towards us all. <br />
<br />
As they say, what goes around, comes around.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="https://www.okshooters.com/forumdisplay.php?27-2nd-Amendment-Legal-amp-Political"><![CDATA[2nd Amendment Legal & Political]]></category>
			<dc:creator>Freedom@AnyCost</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?175175-2nd-Amendment-Belongs-Only-in-History-Books-Alongside-Extinct-Militias</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Maryland didn't just fall today... Damn...]]></title>
			<link>https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?175157-Maryland-didn-t-just-fall-today-Damn&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:08:04 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley signed a gun-control bill Thursday banning the sale of assault-style rifles, including the AR-15. The law limits gun ownership for people with mental illness, outlaws the sale of high-capacity magazines and _establishes the nation's first new handgun licensing scheme...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley signed a gun-control bill Thursday banning the sale of assault-style rifles, including the AR-15. The law limits gun ownership for people with mental illness, outlaws the sale of high-capacity magazines and <u>establishes the nation's first new handgun licensing scheme in two decades</u>. The NRA is challenging the law.<br />
<br />
<br />
Here's the LA Times view:<br />
<a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-maryland-governor-signs-gun-control-law-20130516,0,7299171.story" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.latimes.com/news/nation/n...,7299171.story</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Here's the Washington Times with the changes made to the bill that remove some of its teeth (but not nearly enough):<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/may/16/miller-maryland-gov-omalley-may-be-smiling-last-la/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...iling-last-la/</a><br />
<br />
<br />
I'll admit that I'm a little sick to my stomach over this one.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="https://www.okshooters.com/forumdisplay.php?27-2nd-Amendment-Legal-amp-Political"><![CDATA[2nd Amendment Legal & Political]]></category>
			<dc:creator>ez bake</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?175157-Maryland-didn-t-just-fall-today-Damn</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Repeal of 2010 Health Care Law (Obamacar)</title>
			<link>https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?175132-Repeal-of-2010-Health-Care-Law-(Obamacar)&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 18:06:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[They are voting right now in the House yea/nay to start the repeal process of Obamacare.  
 
15 minute vote time, and 12 min left. 
 
This is 1 of 3 votes they will have on it.  
 
 
Well, hope it gets enough yea's to move on. This is the 3rd time they've voted for a repeal now. It's live on C-SPAN...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>They are voting right now in the House yea/nay to start the repeal process of Obamacare. <br />
<br />
15 minute vote time, and 12 min left.<br />
<br />
This is 1 of 3 votes they will have on it. <br />
<br />
<br />
Well, hope it gets enough yea's to move on. This is the 3rd time they've voted for a repeal now. It's live on C-SPAN with live voting results.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="https://www.okshooters.com/forumdisplay.php?27-2nd-Amendment-Legal-amp-Political"><![CDATA[2nd Amendment Legal & Political]]></category>
			<dc:creator>excat_56</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?175132-Repeal-of-2010-Health-Care-Law-(Obamacar)</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Personalized Handgun Safety Act of 2013</title>
			<link>https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?175127-Personalized-Handgun-Safety-Act-of-2013&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 15:27:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>http://www.nraila.org/news-issues/in-the-news/2013/5/personalized-guns-bill-introduced.aspx 
 
 
---Quote--- 
 The bill, the Personalized Handgun Safety Act of 2013, mandates within two years that newly manufactured handguns be equipped with the technology that allows the guns to only work in the...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.nraila.org/news-issues/in-the-news/2013/5/personalized-guns-bill-introduced.aspx" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.nraila.org/news-issues/in...ntroduced.aspx</a><br />
<br />
<div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			 The bill, the Personalized Handgun Safety Act of 2013, mandates within two years that newly manufactured handguns be equipped with the technology that allows the guns to only work in the hands of their owners or other authorized users. Manufacturers that do not meet the standards could be held liable. And individuals or businesses selling older handguns must have them retrofitted with personalization technology within three years after the bill is enacted, <b>at the expense of the federal government.</b>
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div>I think you mean &quot;at the expense of the taxpayer&quot; there...<br />
<br />
Someone needs to tell these people that 007 isn't a documentary.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="https://www.okshooters.com/forumdisplay.php?27-2nd-Amendment-Legal-amp-Political"><![CDATA[2nd Amendment Legal & Political]]></category>
			<dc:creator>n8thegr8</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?175127-Personalized-Handgun-Safety-Act-of-2013</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ohio Man Illegally Arrested for Open Carry Sparks $3M Lawsuit</title>
			<link>https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?175096-Ohio-Man-Illegally-Arrested-for-Open-Carry-Sparks-3M-Lawsuit&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 02:09:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>An Ohio man has slapped local government with a $3.6 million lawsuit after policemen allegedly violated his Constitutional rights. Police detained Ray Call and confiscated his weapon because he openly carried his firearm into a store. 
 
According to reports, Call entered a store late one night...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>An Ohio man has slapped local government with a $3.6 million lawsuit after policemen allegedly violated his Constitutional rights. Police detained Ray Call and confiscated his weapon because he openly carried his firearm into a store.<br />
<br />
According to reports, Call entered a store late one night with his gun openly on display. The authorities were alerted, and fairly soon two policemen arrived on the scene. The police officers held Call in the back of the police car, took his weapon, and demanded that he identify himself.<br />
<br />
Call refused to identify himself. According to Ohio Revised Code, an individual is not obligated to identify himself to a police officer unless the officer reasonably suspects that the individual is involved in a crime.<br />
<br />
When police didn't get any answers out of Call, they threatened to charge him with reckless inconvenience and noise disturbances. Eventually, the strong-arm tactics intimidated Call into revealing his name, at which point police discovered that he had a CCW permit. Police returned his weapon and sent him on his way.<br />
<br />
They also charged Call with obstruction of justice but later dropped those charges.<br />
<br />
You can watch the video below and form your own opinions.<br />
<br />
Call then filed a lawsuit asking for $600,000 in compensatory damages for “emotional trauma” and another $3 million in punitive damage for the “willful, callous and malicious conduct” of the police officers.<br />
<br />
Call’s lawyer, Charles E. McFarland, said, “I normally do not comment on ongoing cases to the media, but believe that the complaint speaks for itself.”<br />
<br />
It appears that Call has a solid case. Police cannot detain citizens and demand identification with no good reason. Call was well within his rights and Ohio laws clearly backed him up. Police could not have taken action against Call unless it appeared that he was about to commit a crime, and the mere presence of a firearm does not constitute suspicion.<br />
<br />
Riverside police Chief Mark Reiss argued, “Had he been truthful with the police and simply provided his identification so that they could have quickly ran it, that encounter would have been over very quickly, within a minute or two.”<br />
<br />
Technically that is true, but the only problem is that Call was under no legal obligation to pacify the police officers. Call’s refusal to identify himself was a Constitutional right.<br />
<br />
After watching the video, what’s your take? Who was in the right during this late-night confrontation?<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=siAqelKBUAA&amp;feature=player_embedded" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=siAqe...layer_embedded</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.opposingviews.com/i/socie...rks-3m-lawsuit" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.opposingviews.com/i/socie...rks-3m-lawsuit</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="https://www.okshooters.com/forumdisplay.php?27-2nd-Amendment-Legal-amp-Political"><![CDATA[2nd Amendment Legal & Political]]></category>
			<dc:creator>neginfluence04</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?175096-Ohio-Man-Illegally-Arrested-for-Open-Carry-Sparks-3M-Lawsuit</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>61% say ‘no’ to guns in homes of kids with mental health problems</title>
			<link>https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?175074-61-say-‘no’-to-guns-in-homes-of-kids-with-mental-health-problems&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 21:34:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[[According to a recent survey of 1,600 parents conducted by the Child Mind Institute and Parents magazine, 60 percent are concerned that kids who have a mental health issue—like Asperger syndrome, which Newtown gunman Adam Lanza reportedly had—are more likely to hurt themselves or others. And 61...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>[According to a recent survey of 1,600 parents conducted by the Child Mind Institute and Parents magazine, 60 percent are concerned that kids who have a mental health issue—like Asperger syndrome, which Newtown gunman Adam Lanza reportedly had—are more likely to hurt themselves or others. And 61 percent of parents said that parents of children with mental health problems should not be allowed to have a gun in their homes...]<br />
<br />
<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/poll-majority-parents-children-mental-health-problems-not-183945378.html;_ylt=Aqe_fy3CPLjVkdUgntEuF.7EeOd_;_ylu=X3oDMTRrdjlkbGU0BG1pdANCbG9nIFNwZWFybWludCBPcmlnaW5hbCBMaXN0BHBrZwNkMjgxZTJkMC02YzkzLTMzMGItODNjZC1lNmI3ZjU5MTZkMWMEcG9zAzIEc2VjA01lZGlhQkxpc3RNaXhlZExQQ0FUZW1wBHZlcgNjOTBiYzA2My1iZDlhLTExZTItYmVmZi04MDc4MGY3NTFlM2I-;_ylg=X3oDMTM0dHE2Ym5kBGludGwDdXMEbGFuZwNlbi11cwRwc3RhaWQDNDRlMzFmMzUtZTI3MC0zOGVmLWFlZGYtNjQ5Y2I4NzJiYTJiBHBzdGNhdANibG9nc3x0aGVzaWRlc2hvdwRwdANzdG9yeXBhZ2U-;_ylv=3" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/...XBhZ2U-;_ylv=3</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="https://www.okshooters.com/forumdisplay.php?27-2nd-Amendment-Legal-amp-Political"><![CDATA[2nd Amendment Legal & Political]]></category>
			<dc:creator>Billybob</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?175074-61-say-‘no’-to-guns-in-homes-of-kids-with-mental-health-problems</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Recent IRS And Associated Press Abuse By Obama</title>
			<link>https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?175038-Recent-IRS-And-Associated-Press-Abuse-By-Obama&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 14:24:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[The NRA as well as editorialists really need to emphasize the recent abuse of the IRS and secretly obtaining phone logs as one more reminder as to why gun owners don't trust a government to have records of their firearms. 
 
   Already there's much talk amongst mainstream media that perhaps they...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>The NRA as well as editorialists really need to emphasize the recent abuse of the IRS and secretly obtaining phone logs as one more reminder as to why gun owners don't trust a government to have records of their firearms.<br />
<br />
   Already there's much talk amongst mainstream media that perhaps they are too cozy with the current administration.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="https://www.okshooters.com/forumdisplay.php?27-2nd-Amendment-Legal-amp-Political"><![CDATA[2nd Amendment Legal & Political]]></category>
			<dc:creator>WessonOil</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?175038-Recent-IRS-And-Associated-Press-Abuse-By-Obama</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Unlawful Carry #5: Any sports arena during a professional sporting event</title>
			<link>https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?174993-Unlawful-Carry-5-Any-sports-arena-during-a-professional-sporting-event&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 23:52:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Is a bunch of rednecks turning left on a dirt track to be considered a "professional sporting event?" 
 
Specifically, Lawton Speedway.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Is a bunch of rednecks turning left on a dirt track to be considered a &quot;professional sporting event?&quot;<br />
<br />
Specifically, Lawton Speedway.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="https://www.okshooters.com/forumdisplay.php?27-2nd-Amendment-Legal-amp-Political"><![CDATA[2nd Amendment Legal & Political]]></category>
			<dc:creator>BallisticBiker</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?174993-Unlawful-Carry-5-Any-sports-arena-during-a-professional-sporting-event</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>History of gun laws pre 1934</title>
			<link>https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?174980-History-of-gun-laws-pre-1934&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 21:52:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Were there any federal firearms laws prior to the nfa of 1934?</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Were there any federal firearms laws prior to the nfa of 1934?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="https://www.okshooters.com/forumdisplay.php?27-2nd-Amendment-Legal-amp-Political"><![CDATA[2nd Amendment Legal & Political]]></category>
			<dc:creator>jfssms</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?174980-History-of-gun-laws-pre-1934</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>LA wants to confiscate legal magazines over ten rounds</title>
			<link>https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?174978-LA-wants-to-confiscate-legal-magazines-over-ten-rounds&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 21:24:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[They couldn't decide what to call a magazine, so they called it something different each time hoping to get it right (they did eventually sorta kinda almost). :D 
 
 
---Quote--- 
A draft ordinance proposed by the Los Angeles City Attorney’s office would declare _large-capacity ammunition...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>They couldn't decide what to call a magazine, so they called it something different each time hoping to get it right (they did eventually sorta kinda almost). :D<br />
<br />
<div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			A draft ordinance proposed by the Los Angeles City Attorney’s office would declare <u>large-capacity ammunition magazines</u> a “public nuisance” and authorize police to confiscate and destroy them.<br />
<br />
KNX 1070&#8242;s Pete Demetriou reports the proposal from City Attorney Carmen Trutanich was met with some skepticism.<br />
<br />
In a report delivered to the City Clerk’s office, the proposed municipal ordinance would provide for <u>high-capacity ammunition clips</u> of more than 10 rounds to be taken off the streets by law enforcement, confiscated and destroyed as a public nuisance that threatens the public health, safety and welfare.<br />
<br />
Trutanich filed the ordinance in response to a motion by City Councilmember Paul Krekorian and at the request of the City Council’s Public Safety Committee on Feb. 22 to draft a municipal law that would authorize a ban on <u>large-capacity magazine clips</u>.<br />
<br />
Under California law, the manufacture, sale or exchange of <u>large-capacity ammunition magazines</u> of more than 10 rounds is prohibited.<br />
<br />
“We believe this ordinance supports Councilmember Krekorian’s interest in getting <u>high-capacity ammunition magazines</u> off our streets,” Trutanich said. “Cities across the country must stand up to America’s gun violence epidemic and do whatever possible to save lives and spare families from the needless tragedy of firearm death and injury.”<br />
<br />
California gun rights groups have already signaled they would challenge such an ordinance if passed by the City Council.
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div><a href="http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2013/03/05/report-police-can-confiscate-high-capacity-ammo-clips-as-public-nuisance/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">full story</a><br />
<br />
It's like a race to fascism in California.<br />
<br />

<iframe class="restrain" title="YouTube video player" width="640" height="390" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/MurRvcydlqQ?wmode=opaque" frameborder="0"></iframe>
</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="https://www.okshooters.com/forumdisplay.php?27-2nd-Amendment-Legal-amp-Political"><![CDATA[2nd Amendment Legal & Political]]></category>
			<dc:creator>n2sooners</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?174978-LA-wants-to-confiscate-legal-magazines-over-ten-rounds</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
