PDA

View Full Version : a few Smiths


bfoster
09-11-2005, 06:22 PM
Revolvers may be passé, but here are a few Smiths:

K22 First Model (Outdoorsman), 22 Long Rifle, 1934 production

<img src="http://www.adacomp.com/~bfoster/pics/S&W/K22_Outdoorsman.jpg" border="0" alt="K22_Outdoorsman.jpg " />


***

K22 Target Masterpiece, 22 Long Rifle, 1947 production

<img src="http://www.adacomp.com/~bfoster/pics/S&W/K22_Target_Masterpiece.jpg" />

***

M 48-2, 22 Rimfire Magnum, 1972 production. The stocks pictured are not original. I'm a bit of a contrarian as I prefer a very high hand position for double action shooting. Unless the stock, particularly the filler and palm swell is made just right for my hand I shoot Smiths better by using a stock without a filler.

<img src="http://www.adacomp.com/~bfoster/pics/S&W/M48-2.jpg" />

***

M53-2, 22 Centerfire Magnum (aka 22 Jet), 1973 production. The stocks pictured are not original.

<img src="http://www.adacomp.com/~bfoster/pics/S&W/M53-2.jpg" />

***

M16-4, 32 H&R Magnum, 1989 production. The factory stocks don't fit me, hence the take-offs pictured.

<img src="http://www.adacomp.com/~bfoster/pics/S&W/M16-4.jpg" />

***

M&P of 1905, 4th Change, Target Model, 38 Special, 1918 production. In revolvers chambered for this cartridge the original (pre Magna) stocks aren't nearly as bad as their reputation.

<img src="http://www.adacomp.com/~bfoster/pics/S&W/38_M&P_4th_Target.jpg" />

***

K38 Target Masterpiece, 38 Special, 1952 production.

<img src="http://www.adacomp.com/~bfoster/pics/S&W/K38_Target_Masterpiece.jpg" />

***
M&P Heavy Duty, 38/44 (an early version of the 38 Special +P+ cartridge), 1938 production. Modified, probably during the 1950's, for target use. Micro Sights and hammer/trigger package. Very accurate, but, as is the case with most revolvers so modified it's not wise to shoot them DA due to reliability issues.

<img src="http://www.adacomp.com/~bfoster/pics/S&W/Heavy_Duty.jpg" />

***

Magnum (registered), 357 Magnum, 1937 production. 8" barrel. Letters as having the King red reflector front sight and Roper stocks pictured installed by the factory.

<img src="http://www.adacomp.com/~bfoster/pics/S&W/Magnum.jpg" />

***
M57, 41 Magnum, 1964 production. An early "S" numbered revolver. The stocks pictured aren't original.

<img src="http://www.adacomp.com/~bfoster/pics/S&W/M57.jpg" />

***

Triplelock, 44 Special (M&P of 1908, 44 Special), 1908 production. Modified, probably during the 1950's for the pictured Micro front sight base. I removed the Micro front sight blade and substituted another insert. I removed the Micro rear sight which was on this revolver when I acquired it, heliarced the frame, and installed a post-war S&W rear sight. I've reblued this revolver. The stocks aren't original, the first triplelocks produced didn't have the emblem. I do use Magna stocks for shooting this revolver: the old timers habitually wrapped the stocks of their 1908's and 1917's with friction tape: not to do so invites a very sore hand...

<img src="http://www.adacomp.com/~bfoster/pics/S&W/Triplelock.jpg" />

***

M 1950, 44 Special, Factory matte blue version, 1954 production.

<img src="http://www.adacomp.com/~bfoster/pics/S&W/M1950_44_Special.jpg" />

***

M24-3, 44 Special. One of the Lew Horton specials. My around the ranch carry revolver. Here, the pictured stocks work for me. Too high a hold on this revolver causes me to shoot slightly off point of aim.

<img src="http://www.adacomp.com/~bfoster/pics/S&W/M24-3.jpg" />

***

M1955, 45 AR and 45 ACP (with moonclip), 1956 production. Not the original stocks.

<img src="http://www.adacomp.com/~bfoster/pics/S&W/M1955_45ACP.jpg" />

*** ***

If you liked the Smiths and would like to see a few Colts, Webleys, pistols, or long guns, let me know. It may motivate me to take a few more pics...

An overdue apology to dial-up users is given.

Bob

edit: fix links

Michael Brown
09-11-2005, 09:18 PM
Love the Lew Horton.

The Model 24 was a gun Smith never should have taken out of production. It is one of the finest combat revolvers ever.

I personally don't care for the new "Thunder Ranch Special" model 24. Too glossy for me. Yours is the one.

Michael Brown

bfoster
09-12-2005, 01:38 AM
Micheal,

I agree. The ornamentation on the Thunder Ranch Special is in poor taste.

I confess to liking guns where the engraving and inlay is done rather chastely. One regret I have is turning down a postwar "pre-model 27" that had been engraved by Arnold Griebel. This gun been blued somewhere other than the factory to deal with some minor corrosion on the cylinder. Griebel's work, reblued (without damage), is worthwhile.

Bob

Michael Brown
09-12-2005, 09:36 AM
I agree.

A combat pistol should be understated in appearance and speak loudly when needed.

Michael Brown

GMThunder
09-12-2005, 10:17 AM
You have some great looking wheelguns there my friend. Post more pics when you get a chance.

bulbboy
09-12-2005, 10:33 AM
Dang!! Thats alot of revolvers!