In OK? Really?

[OHJEEZE]

Your children will be forced to interact with people that did, so unless you give enough of a F to help change it....then it won't matter if they do or they don't, because public education ain't going away.

I could see the current public (indoctrination) school system going away if enough parents wake up.

With some states going to where the tax money follows the student, that might help it along.

It might not be in my lifetime, but I pray the change comes!

There are so many better options now, and endless posibilities.

There could be neighborhood group school run only by the childrens parents in the future.

I can see lots of possibilities.

 

[conditionzero]

I could see the current public (indoctrination) school system going away if enough parents wake up.

With some states going to where the tax money follows the student, that might help it along.

It might not be in my lifetime, but I pray the change comes!

There are so many better options now, and endless posibilities.

There could be neighborhood group school run only by the childrens parents in the future.

I can see lots of possibilities.

We do that very thing with several families around here. They are all very intelligent, learning the good stuff and none of the trash.

 

[Buddhaman]

Oh ok, so not supporting pedophiles makes you NO BETTER than the ATF. That's totally differnt. Thank you, pedo enabler, for the clarification .

And.... nope. Done with your dumb ass. I've stated my point many times and you keep ignoring it to call me a pedo supporter or enabler. May you stub your toe every morning and die of old age.

 

[HillsideDesolate]

And.... nope. Done with your dumb ass. I've stated my point many times and you keep ignoring it to call me a pedo supporter or enabler. May you stub your toe every morning and die of old age.

May you suffer on earth before spending eternity in hell with the rest of the pedophile advocates.

 

[caliberbob]

And.... nope. Done with your dumb ass. I've stated my point many times and you keep ignoring it to call me a pedo supporter or enabler. May you stub your toe every morning and die of old age.

You didn’t respond to me yet? I made a very compelling argument using your logic about how Jeffery Epstein didn’t engage in sex trafficking. Also, I liked your comment in another thread

 

[JD8]

Never said it was supporting the ATF, just that it doesn't make you any better than them. Quit twisting what I said.

Which is like saying you're equal to Jeffery Epstein because you're apologizing for a pedophile.

 

[Buddhaman]

You didn’t respond to me yet? I made a very compelling argument using your logic about how Jeffery Epstein didn’t engage in sex trafficking. Also, I liked your comment in another thread

I'm trying to piece together how a wealthy and powerful individual, protected by other wealthy and powerful individuals, is equivalent to a random guy in Oklahoma. Epstein even plead guilty and served time in "prison" for "procuring for prostitution a girl below age 18" before his other crimes were looked into. So... he engaged in sex trafficking and got killed by his other wealthy and powerful clients when it looked like he might snitch.

Random guy in Oklahoma, accused of possessing child porn, investigated, charges dropped as per the article "According to a local report that covered the story, the charges were dismissed because it could not be proven that the images were of individuals under the age of 18".

Yeah, that's a good comparison.

 

[caliberbob]

I'm trying to piece together how a wealthy and powerful individual, protected by other wealthy and powerful individuals, is equivalent to a random guy in Oklahoma. Epstein even plead guilty and served time in "prison" for "procuring for prostitution a girl below age 18" before his other crimes were looked into. So... he engaged in sex trafficking and got killed by his other wealthy and powerful clients when it looked like he might snitch.

Random guy in Oklahoma, accused of possessing child porn, investigated, charges dropped as per the article "According to a local report that covered the story, the charges were dismissed because it could not be proven that the images were of individuals under the age of 18".

Yeah, that's a good comparison.

No sir, I’m not talking about his previous conviction. I’m talking about his pending charges being dismissed by a judge.

 

[Buddhaman]

No sir, I’m not talking about his previous conviction. I’m talking about his pending charges being dismissed by a judge.

The ones where he "died" in a jail cell before trial? I'm not sure we're at the levels of the Catholic Church putting corpses on trial.

 

[HillsideDesolate]

I'm trying to piece together how a wealthy and powerful individual, protected by other wealthy and powerful individuals, is equivalent to a random guy in Oklahoma. Epstein even plead guilty and served time in "prison" for "procuring for prostitution a girl below age 18" before his other crimes were looked into. So... he engaged in sex trafficking and got killed by his other wealthy and powerful clients when it looked like he might snitch.

Random guy in Oklahoma, accused of possessing child porn, investigated, charges dropped as per the article "According to a local report that covered the story, the charges were dismissed because it could not be proven that the images were of individuals under the age of 18".

Yeah, that's a good comparison.

A cross dressing school principal who views possible child pornography and is in a position of power over hundreds of children is not "some random guy in Oklahoma."