https://www.google.com/amp/www.inqu...ses-speculation/amp/?client=ms-android-att-us
Haha happy birthday hillary
Haha happy birthday hillary
hope its true ... enquiring minds want to know....
What do you want to bet that not a single one of them contains any information about yoga classes or Chelsea's wedding.
Won't matter unfortunately - the Dems have election fraud down to a fine art.
From an email I received recently.....
"Former United States Attorney General Michael Mukasey tells MSNBC that not only is Hillary Clinton's private emails server illegal, it "disqualifies" her from holding ANY federal office... Such as, say, President of the United States. Very specifically points to one federal law, Title 18. Section 2071.
For those of us who do not have United States Code committed to memory, here's what it says, word for word from the Cornell Law Library;
(a). Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
(b). Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroy the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term "office" does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States."
Yes, it explicitly states "shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States."
Shouldn't voters know that? The media won't tell them. So it's up to us. Can you help hold Hillary accountable? Pass this on, please.
Now! Does anyone believe that this will make a difference?
If Hillary is allowed to run for office of ANY kind, it will show us that the Washington D.C. establishment is SO much more corrupt than we thought."
"Former United States Attorney General Michael Mukasey tells MSNBC that not only is Hillary Clinton's private emails server illegal, it "disqualifies" her from holding ANY federal office... Such as, say, President of the United States. Very specifically points to one federal law, Title 18. Section 2071.
For those of us who do not have United States Code committed to memory, here's what it says, word for word from the Cornell Law Library;
(a). Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
(b). Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroy the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term "office" does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States."
Yes, it explicitly states "shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States."
Shouldn't voters know that? The media won't tell them. So it's up to us. Can you help hold Hillary accountable? Pass this on, please.
Now! Does anyone believe that this will make a difference?
If Hillary is allowed to run for office of ANY kind, it will show us that the Washington D.C. establishment is SO much more corrupt than we thought."
I don't mean to laugh, but it's comical that some people think we still live under the rule of law. That we aren't living in an oligarchy.
I'm not sure what's more laughable? That a few still believe we have the rule of law, or that so many just don't care that we don't?
Oh this is too rich to pass up......
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog...opened_pandoras_box_for_huma_and_hillary.html
Seems as though the brain trust was not so smart in that since they, or many of them had immunity, they thought the fix was in......seems they forgot about 'ol Carlos Danger.....
I'm thinking it's about time for some odds of his upcoming "Ark-incide"....
Cliff notes:
"So, what could they have found on Weiner’s computers that would have caused such alarm?
I’d think one of two things:
1) Either that Huma signed in her e-mail account at one point and, presumably, it being Exchange or IMAP, dumped the whole account onto the computer and that account has plenty of e-mails between her and Clinton that were deleted.
Or -
2) There’s mention of Huma having a Yahoo account to which she would forward things for printing purposes. This struck me right away because, of course, printers are often difficult to configure as are e-mail accounts. It struck me as strange, yet very believable, that she mentioned that she’d forward stuff to that Yahoo account to print them. I mean, printing in theory should be platform agnostic, but - if you’re technically unsophisticated - you might have serious problems trying to setup an e-mail account or a printer on a device. Thus I imagine a scenario where she has a portable machine that either she can’t (or can’t be, for some reason) configured to use her home printer and a desktop machine (I imagine an slightly-older iMac here) that’s physically connected to the printer that serves as a shared “family computer” or whatever. She either can’t setup the e-mail account on that computer (perhaps it requires a VPN or something like that) or doesn’t want to, so she forwards everything that she wants to print to the Yahoo account that she does have setup on that computer. The FBI takes this computer as part of the Weiner investigation and, bam, they find thousands of e-mail messages - again, evidence of what was destroyed earlier."
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog...opened_pandoras_box_for_huma_and_hillary.html
Seems as though the brain trust was not so smart in that since they, or many of them had immunity, they thought the fix was in......seems they forgot about 'ol Carlos Danger.....
I'm thinking it's about time for some odds of his upcoming "Ark-incide"....
Cliff notes:
"So, what could they have found on Weiner’s computers that would have caused such alarm?
I’d think one of two things:
1) Either that Huma signed in her e-mail account at one point and, presumably, it being Exchange or IMAP, dumped the whole account onto the computer and that account has plenty of e-mails between her and Clinton that were deleted.
Or -
2) There’s mention of Huma having a Yahoo account to which she would forward things for printing purposes. This struck me right away because, of course, printers are often difficult to configure as are e-mail accounts. It struck me as strange, yet very believable, that she mentioned that she’d forward stuff to that Yahoo account to print them. I mean, printing in theory should be platform agnostic, but - if you’re technically unsophisticated - you might have serious problems trying to setup an e-mail account or a printer on a device. Thus I imagine a scenario where she has a portable machine that either she can’t (or can’t be, for some reason) configured to use her home printer and a desktop machine (I imagine an slightly-older iMac here) that’s physically connected to the printer that serves as a shared “family computer” or whatever. She either can’t setup the e-mail account on that computer (perhaps it requires a VPN or something like that) or doesn’t want to, so she forwards everything that she wants to print to the Yahoo account that she does have setup on that computer. The FBI takes this computer as part of the Weiner investigation and, bam, they find thousands of e-mail messages - again, evidence of what was destroyed earlier."
Last edited:
A few, speculative, though interesting details emerge:
Carlos had a file labeled "Life Insurance" that held the some 650K emails. That's probably a lot more than his soon to be ex actually wrote or sent...
Comey's hand may have been forced by wikileaks, it is being suggested they have the file as well.
This is going to get real with significant governmental actors as well as international level donors to the foundation being brought to light.
I'd think that since these were acquired outside on any immunity deals those who were granted immunity for their non-testimony are likely to be a bit concerned as well....
Time will tell.....
Carlos had a file labeled "Life Insurance" that held the some 650K emails. That's probably a lot more than his soon to be ex actually wrote or sent...
Comey's hand may have been forced by wikileaks, it is being suggested they have the file as well.
This is going to get real with significant governmental actors as well as international level donors to the foundation being brought to light.
I'd think that since these were acquired outside on any immunity deals those who were granted immunity for their non-testimony are likely to be a bit concerned as well....
Time will tell.....
