At this point, How are you Planning to vote?

**Cards81fan** · 09-02-2012, 09:34 AM

Originally Posted by WTJ

Wealth? Money? Cash? You can count it, and hold it in your hands.......

Fractional Reserve banking ain't tangible, buddy.

**Cards81fan** · 09-02-2012, 09:41 AM

Originally Posted by Boehlertaught

I think the real snake head will come out in his second term. Why not? He'll have nothing to loose.

This theory never made sense to me. He had both houses of Congress at the start of his first term. He was president already then. He had nothing to loose from 2009-2010.

Fearmongering is entirely irrational and unproductive.

**flatwins** · 09-02-2012, 10:12 AM

Originally Posted by Cards81fan

This theory never made sense to me. He had both houses of Congress at the start of his first term. He was president already then. He had nothing to loose from 2009-2010.

Fearmongering is entirely irrational and unproductive.

I'm not sure I totally agree. He did have control of both houses and ramrodded his dream piece of legislation through and with intent to do it at any cost. The cost was he really hacked off voters who displayed their feelings during the elections of 2010. I feel he would have done more damage but knew he risked not only his reelection but possible damage to much of his own zombie-like voting base.
If he were to be reelected, THEN would he truly have nothing to lose. It's clear to me the goals he has for the US and if he wasn't concerned about reelection would try to institute those goals at any cost.

We're generally taught to "go with our gut" when faced with a decision and this guy has given me a gut ache for about 5 years now.

**WTJ** · 09-02-2012, 08:00 PM

Originally Posted by Cards81fan

Fractional Reserve banking ain't tangible, buddy.

Buddy is half a word.

**Lurker66** · 09-02-2012, 10:44 PM

Whats the other half?

**yukonjack** · 09-03-2012, 01:39 AM

Originally Posted by Cards81fan

Fractional Reserve banking ain't tangible, buddy.

Romney has more cash on hand then you have zits on your gonads. That's tangible. You can count them if you feel so inclined.

**264killer** · 09-03-2012, 01:25 PM

I am not a yellow dog dimi, but would vote for a yellow dog before i would vote for obama.

**greezypete** · 09-03-2012, 02:18 PM

[QUOTE=Biggsly;1885278]We are all screwed.[/Q]

This is the way I see it too.

**Harley0368** · 09-03-2012, 02:21 PM

In my opinion Romney is our best choice

**bootsbaker** · 09-03-2012, 03:36 PM

Originally Posted by Cards81fan

Explain to me how "opposing gay marriage" is a "value?"

well its all up to a matter of interpretation some people who are very religious and consider homosexual lifestyle amoral etc would consider it a value. dont shoot the messenger im just saying I see and talk to a lot of people on daily basis and its the general consensus, didnt say it was good or bad. chill.

**bootsbaker** · 09-03-2012, 03:41 PM

Originally Posted by elwoodtrix

what does a women's body and sexual orientation have to do with running a government?

nothing again general consensus and lib politicians are more invasive into everyones body & bedrooms. dont eat smoke or drink that size, you must talk about everyones gayness at any given moment in time, I could give 2 shits if someones gay, honestly I don't care but please stop yammering on about it. Its getting ridiculous nobody goes around flaunting themselves as being hetero like they do being gay, I mean take the olympics for instance, one of the divers had a whole story done on him being gay. Really WHO CARES! your an olympic diver and we give a crap about your sex life. I didn't see any Hey, that diver over there hes totally straight, isnt that wonderful bla bla bla. its so stupid and just another way to divide and conquer us all, pay attention to each other not what were doing in DC

**bootsbaker** · 09-03-2012, 03:45 PM

Originally Posted by Lurker66

Nope Obama doesnt identify with Ok. My point that ive been yacking about is Romney is a RINO, he doesnt have any Republican values. His record tramples on Republican values.

But he's the GOP's man now.

holy crap, we agree. I did say he was conservative but thats such a loose term these days.

**Lurker66** · 09-03-2012, 07:19 PM

Originally Posted by bootsbaker

holy crap, we agree. I did say he was conservative but thats such a loose term these days.

glad we found some common ground. Just dont look at Romneys record too close or look at Obama's legislation. You might start blaming congress and the Senate for not doing their job.

**gmplaster** · 09-03-2012, 07:26 PM

Obamacare will all but stop developments in medicine since the investment in R&D is always high and the return will be low.

**BrandX** · 09-03-2012, 07:28 PM

Until there is a true 3rd party movement; does it really matter who we vote for? Both Dem's and Rep's are backed by "super packs", who truly run Washington. If you vote lib or green or com its basically a waste of a vote, because they have 0% chance of winning. Its frustrating