Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
1.6 liter Ope Astral Diesel 2014
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Old Timer" data-source="post: 2847840" data-attributes="member: 24440"><p>The way the EPA measures the pollutants from a car is so much per gallon of gas, </p><p>not so much per mile. That makes car makers run vehicles so rich to make the catalytic converters </p><p>clean up the exhaust. </p><p>If you compared the pollutants per mile, or per life time, I am sure a lot of these engine emissions </p><p>would be better off then the engines we have.</p><p></p><p>This is how it was explained to me by an engineering professor</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Old Timer, post: 2847840, member: 24440"] The way the EPA measures the pollutants from a car is so much per gallon of gas, not so much per mile. That makes car makers run vehicles so rich to make the catalytic converters clean up the exhaust. If you compared the pollutants per mile, or per life time, I am sure a lot of these engine emissions would be better off then the engines we have. This is how it was explained to me by an engineering professor [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
1.6 liter Ope Astral Diesel 2014
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom