Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
.357 SIG -- A Solution in Search of a Problem?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JD8" data-source="post: 744555" data-attributes="member: 24"><p>Oh ya.... I was just thinking...... we need a good ballistic dead horse.</p><p></p><p>Notice no reference was given in the article.... which is antiquated.... much like the whole "solution in search of a problem" phrase that gets applied to just about everything. </p><p></p><p>I used to get into these wars on Glock Talk. Once you ask the anti .357sig boys (in which I NEVER understood why people concern themselves so much with what other people shoot) to prove there is a critical period in which damage occurs in terms of increasing velocity, rather that it is not a sigmoidal curve..... they shut up, change the arguement, or tout 1294982 year old data using street results or gel. Neither of which are totally accurate. The science involved usually goes over their head pretty quickly..... <img src="/images/smilies/biggrin.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":D" title="Big Grin :D" data-shortname=":D" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JD8, post: 744555, member: 24"] Oh ya.... I was just thinking...... we need a good ballistic dead horse. Notice no reference was given in the article.... which is antiquated.... much like the whole "solution in search of a problem" phrase that gets applied to just about everything. I used to get into these wars on Glock Talk. Once you ask the anti .357sig boys (in which I NEVER understood why people concern themselves so much with what other people shoot) to prove there is a critical period in which damage occurs in terms of increasing velocity, rather that it is not a sigmoidal curve..... they shut up, change the arguement, or tout 1294982 year old data using street results or gel. Neither of which are totally accurate. The science involved usually goes over their head pretty quickly..... :D [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
.357 SIG -- A Solution in Search of a Problem?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom