Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
50 years of getting climate change wrong
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tanis143" data-source="post: 3276279" data-attributes="member: 43724"><p>One thing that struck me from the first few clippings is they called for "population control". I.E. they would be sterilization drugs in food staples in order to prevent us from reproduction. I'm willing to bet that it would be setup in such a way that only the rich could afford the reversal drugs and the poor would be prevented from having children. </p><p></p><p>Because that is so far reaching and generally not looked upon in favor, maybe they took a step back and decided to start small. First they got control of the land (hello BLM and eminent domain), then they made rules of what you can and cannot due on land you own (hello EPA). Now that they are ready to exert complete control they seek to eliminate private firearm ownership. THEN they can re-introduce population control, but this time we peons won't have a choice.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tanis143, post: 3276279, member: 43724"] One thing that struck me from the first few clippings is they called for "population control". I.E. they would be sterilization drugs in food staples in order to prevent us from reproduction. I'm willing to bet that it would be setup in such a way that only the rich could afford the reversal drugs and the poor would be prevented from having children. Because that is so far reaching and generally not looked upon in favor, maybe they took a step back and decided to start small. First they got control of the land (hello BLM and eminent domain), then they made rules of what you can and cannot due on land you own (hello EPA). Now that they are ready to exert complete control they seek to eliminate private firearm ownership. THEN they can re-introduce population control, but this time we peons won't have a choice. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
50 years of getting climate change wrong
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom