Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
50 years of getting climate change wrong
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tanis143" data-source="post: 3276358" data-attributes="member: 43724"><p>I agree with this. However, I also agree we should do more to protect the environment. No, I'm not into "green energy" simply because its not 100% viable. I would love to put up solar panels so during the day my electric meter doesn't run, but I still need a power source one the sun goes down and I don't have enough garage space for a battery system that would support that. Wind is about the same though I will give it credit that it works at night. Instead of spending more and more money on these technologies, we should be putting money into nuclear fission or finding a way to harness all the potential energy from nuclear substances. </p><p></p><p>But honestly, we could do more about polluting our environment. I really don't care for landfills. I've been to the landfill here in Tulsa and was surprised at what was allowed to be dumped there. We could do more to limit or eradicate pollutants from getting into our streams and rivers. </p><p></p><p>But, these cockamanie schemes these politicians are cooking up are not feasible and place a huge burden on even the middle class. It would make owning a car an unreachable goal for many families. People would have to go without power and in this day and age you can't live in the city unless you have electricity in your home (how that works I dunno, its like we never had power and survived as a species). Its really a poorly disguised attempt for the left to control yet another aspect of our lives.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tanis143, post: 3276358, member: 43724"] I agree with this. However, I also agree we should do more to protect the environment. No, I'm not into "green energy" simply because its not 100% viable. I would love to put up solar panels so during the day my electric meter doesn't run, but I still need a power source one the sun goes down and I don't have enough garage space for a battery system that would support that. Wind is about the same though I will give it credit that it works at night. Instead of spending more and more money on these technologies, we should be putting money into nuclear fission or finding a way to harness all the potential energy from nuclear substances. But honestly, we could do more about polluting our environment. I really don't care for landfills. I've been to the landfill here in Tulsa and was surprised at what was allowed to be dumped there. We could do more to limit or eradicate pollutants from getting into our streams and rivers. But, these cockamanie schemes these politicians are cooking up are not feasible and place a huge burden on even the middle class. It would make owning a car an unreachable goal for many families. People would have to go without power and in this day and age you can't live in the city unless you have electricity in your home (how that works I dunno, its like we never had power and survived as a species). Its really a poorly disguised attempt for the left to control yet another aspect of our lives. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
50 years of getting climate change wrong
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom