Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
742
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="trbii" data-source="post: 3859123" data-attributes="member: 2449"><p>I read Remington updated/improved the bolt lugs in 1980. Changed from a multi lugged small width-to-larger, beefier, fewer lug bolt face design. I get the impression that the disassembly/maintenance procedure was complex enough that it caused the more casual, uninterested rifle owners to disregard that chore. Wondered if that accelerated the wear and eventual failure to function of that model.?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="trbii, post: 3859123, member: 2449"] I read Remington updated/improved the bolt lugs in 1980. Changed from a multi lugged small width-to-larger, beefier, fewer lug bolt face design. I get the impression that the disassembly/maintenance procedure was complex enough that it caused the more casual, uninterested rifle owners to disregard that chore. Wondered if that accelerated the wear and eventual failure to function of that model.? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
742
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom