Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
A serious question
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jason Freeland" data-source="post: 3762484" data-attributes="member: 45827"><p>My vote is work on geosynchronous solar, as I've already mentioned earlier. It has the least footprint of any of them and if we put a solar panel factory on the moon, we can get a lot of the environmental issues with production, off earth entirely. Plenty of raw materials up there to do it with. We even have water ice at the poles for fuel, to move them into earth orbit. Short term I think 3rd and 4th generation fission reactors need to be ramped up.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jason Freeland, post: 3762484, member: 45827"] My vote is work on geosynchronous solar, as I've already mentioned earlier. It has the least footprint of any of them and if we put a solar panel factory on the moon, we can get a lot of the environmental issues with production, off earth entirely. Plenty of raw materials up there to do it with. We even have water ice at the poles for fuel, to move them into earth orbit. Short term I think 3rd and 4th generation fission reactors need to be ramped up. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
A serious question
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom