Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Alec baldwin
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="donner" data-source="post: 4019496" data-attributes="member: 277"><p>do we know that baldwin has a background with real guns? If not, i could see a situation where he didn't know to check it once he received it. We are a group of people who have been taught to be careful, yet we still have people admit to ND situations. If he is a typical hollywood type, and his only experience is on set, where all the guns go through a person paid to ensure they are safe, then why would he expect this instance to be any different?</p><p></p><p>I'm not saying this to let him off the hook, i'm just saying it seems very possible that he behaved the way he would have in any of the other situations where he handled a prop gun. </p><p></p><p>Also, IIRC, the special prosecutors are saying the charges were dropped (for now) because there are indications that the gun might have been modified and behaved unexpectedly. Or at least that there was enough indication that they weren't comfortable moving forward with charges (i.e. they probably didn't think they were assured a win).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="donner, post: 4019496, member: 277"] do we know that baldwin has a background with real guns? If not, i could see a situation where he didn't know to check it once he received it. We are a group of people who have been taught to be careful, yet we still have people admit to ND situations. If he is a typical hollywood type, and his only experience is on set, where all the guns go through a person paid to ensure they are safe, then why would he expect this instance to be any different? I'm not saying this to let him off the hook, i'm just saying it seems very possible that he behaved the way he would have in any of the other situations where he handled a prop gun. Also, IIRC, the special prosecutors are saying the charges were dropped (for now) because there are indications that the gun might have been modified and behaved unexpectedly. Or at least that there was enough indication that they weren't comfortable moving forward with charges (i.e. they probably didn't think they were assured a win). [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Alec baldwin
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom