Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
ATF used "Fast and Furious" to make the case for gun regulations
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Glocktogo" data-source="post: 1826842" data-attributes="member: 1132"><p>Your comment referenced the article, but not specific comments within (at least from my reading). The emails and the article reference using F&F statistics to support Demand letter #3, which is exactly what they did for the southwest region. In the early days of the Obama administration, they were inundating the media with weekly refrains of border violence being aided by lax US gun laws and straw purchasers. They made it seem as if gun mules were carrying armloads out of stores unopposed. As it turns out, the dealers wanted to turn them away empty handed and the ATF strongarmed them into selling anyway, which they then used as fodder for their campaign for more laws and regulations. That smells of a concerted effort on the part of the administration.</p><p></p><p>Here's another tidbit that smells pretty rank. </p><p></p><p><a href="http://sipseystreetirregulars.blogspot.com/2012/06/sipsey-street-exclusive-strategic_17.html" target="_blank">http://sipseystreetirregulars.blogspot.com/2012/06/sipsey-street-exclusive-strategic_17.html</a></p><p></p><p>Its a long article and deserves to be read in its entirety, but Ill post the most relevant parts:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Who is McDonough? He's the guy sitting between Hillary and the AF General (at the table) during the Bin-Laden raid in Abbottabad. </p><p></p><p><img src="https://www.okshooters.com/data/MetaMirrorCache/1.bp.blogspot.com__D630YDRZtWk_T91xikYLmaI_AAAAAAAAMI4_Tt7V4OO8f791a75da5c52f3539a18e8f26dc555.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p>You can't look at one report or one email to see the pattern emerge. It requires an in-depth analysis of the totality to paint an accurate picture. That picture has all the hallmarks of a politically motivated op. One that wasn't revealed by the players who were furthering the anti-gun agenda of the administration. They were ratted out by one of their unwilling accomplices.</p><p></p><p>The ensuing obfuscation is glaring. Watching Holder and company delay, defer, deny, mislead and parse details to the sub-molecular level is telling. They want Congress and the nation to be confused. They do not want clarity and they're doing nothing in furtherance of the truth. Again, hallmarks of a political op. The truth is there, but you can't see it from the surface. You have to dig to see it. <img src="/images/smilies/frown.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" data-shortname=":(" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Glocktogo, post: 1826842, member: 1132"] Your comment referenced the article, but not specific comments within (at least from my reading). The emails and the article reference using F&F statistics to support Demand letter #3, which is exactly what they did for the southwest region. In the early days of the Obama administration, they were inundating the media with weekly refrains of border violence being aided by lax US gun laws and straw purchasers. They made it seem as if gun mules were carrying armloads out of stores unopposed. As it turns out, the dealers wanted to turn them away empty handed and the ATF strongarmed them into selling anyway, which they then used as fodder for their campaign for more laws and regulations. That smells of a concerted effort on the part of the administration. Here's another tidbit that smells pretty rank. [url]http://sipseystreetirregulars.blogspot.com/2012/06/sipsey-street-exclusive-strategic_17.html[/url] Its a long article and deserves to be read in its entirety, but Ill post the most relevant parts: Who is McDonough? He's the guy sitting between Hillary and the AF General (at the table) during the Bin-Laden raid in Abbottabad. [IMG]https://www.okshooters.com/data/MetaMirrorCache/1.bp.blogspot.com__D630YDRZtWk_T91xikYLmaI_AAAAAAAAMI4_Tt7V4OO8f791a75da5c52f3539a18e8f26dc555.jpg[/IMG] You can't look at one report or one email to see the pattern emerge. It requires an in-depth analysis of the totality to paint an accurate picture. That picture has all the hallmarks of a politically motivated op. One that wasn't revealed by the players who were furthering the anti-gun agenda of the administration. They were ratted out by one of their unwilling accomplices. The ensuing obfuscation is glaring. Watching Holder and company delay, defer, deny, mislead and parse details to the sub-molecular level is telling. They want Congress and the nation to be confused. They do not want clarity and they're doing nothing in furtherance of the truth. Again, hallmarks of a political op. The truth is there, but you can't see it from the surface. You have to dig to see it. :( [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
ATF used "Fast and Furious" to make the case for gun regulations
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom