Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Driver intentionally hits passing motorcycle...
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shootin 4 Fun" data-source="post: 2803160" data-attributes="member: 6465"><p>In the video the guy with the camera is pretty consistently passing telephone poles at 1 per 3 seconds +/- a little. Standard distance between poles is 125-300 feet. Worst case scenario, he was traveling 100 feet per second. Any idea what that equates to in miles per hour? 68 m.p.h., that's not excessive based on the posted speed limit being 65 m.p.h. At the time of the accident he was traveling at about 4 poles per second or 51 m.p.h.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shootin 4 Fun, post: 2803160, member: 6465"] In the video the guy with the camera is pretty consistently passing telephone poles at 1 per 3 seconds +/- a little. Standard distance between poles is 125-300 feet. Worst case scenario, he was traveling 100 feet per second. Any idea what that equates to in miles per hour? 68 m.p.h., that's not excessive based on the posted speed limit being 65 m.p.h. At the time of the accident he was traveling at about 4 poles per second or 51 m.p.h. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Driver intentionally hits passing motorcycle...
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom