Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Employers can forbid guns, a judge rules, issues an injunction against OK law.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Werewolf" data-source="post: 1081669" data-attributes="member: 239"><p>I understand all about sole proprietorships and partnerships. FWIW the sole proprietorship is almost dead as most individual business owners set up their businesses under various laws that seperate their business and private assets to protect themselves from personal liability while retaining the antiquated sole proprietorship description. Partnerships do the same thing. If business schools at the university level are still teaching the old form that sole proprietorships and partnerships took re: personal liability of the owners someone needs to kick their professors out into the real world where they can get a lesson in reality.</p><p></p><p>Be that as it may:</p><p>Both type of non-corporate entities invite the public onto their property to do business. Just like a corporation does.They both employ people (unless it's a one man operation). Regardless of how the law treats them based on how the owners are compensated they are still business entities that should be treated differently from an individual.</p><p></p><p>As for shareholders - can you say plural? They stop being individuals and start being a group when they become shareholders<strong>S</strong>.</p><p></p><p>Businesses are businesses no matter how the lawyers and courts have spun it. They shouldn't have the same rights as a human being.</p><p></p><p>That ole argument about don't want to disarm don't come on my property works both ways. Want my business don't try to disarm me. That's a fundamental conflict between a non human business entity and a citizen.</p><p></p><p>Personally I think citizens have more value than non-human business entities.</p><p></p><p>Don't YOU?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Werewolf, post: 1081669, member: 239"] I understand all about sole proprietorships and partnerships. FWIW the sole proprietorship is almost dead as most individual business owners set up their businesses under various laws that seperate their business and private assets to protect themselves from personal liability while retaining the antiquated sole proprietorship description. Partnerships do the same thing. If business schools at the university level are still teaching the old form that sole proprietorships and partnerships took re: personal liability of the owners someone needs to kick their professors out into the real world where they can get a lesson in reality. Be that as it may: Both type of non-corporate entities invite the public onto their property to do business. Just like a corporation does.They both employ people (unless it's a one man operation). Regardless of how the law treats them based on how the owners are compensated they are still business entities that should be treated differently from an individual. As for shareholders - can you say plural? They stop being individuals and start being a group when they become shareholders[B]S[/B]. Businesses are businesses no matter how the lawyers and courts have spun it. They shouldn't have the same rights as a human being. That ole argument about don't want to disarm don't come on my property works both ways. Want my business don't try to disarm me. That's a fundamental conflict between a non human business entity and a citizen. Personally I think citizens have more value than non-human business entities. Don't YOU? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Employers can forbid guns, a judge rules, issues an injunction against OK law.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom