Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
EXCLUSIVE: NOAA Relies On Compromised Thermometers That Inflate US Warming Trend
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="farmerbyron" data-source="post: 2826493" data-attributes="member: 4953"><p>But you can find plenty of data to advocate for more gun control. It is only your perspective on the issue that makes you see the data you want to see. There is credible data on opposing sides of about any issue. Your bias will dictate which data you favor. </p><p></p><p>I'm a big advocate for science but any of the solutions presented to combat GW are economic in nature and would not make a significant impact on a reduction in warming. Plus our high resolution dataset is so small at this point, how the hell do we even know what normal is? We just came out of a little ice age a mere century ago so if our baseline of high quality data starts at the end of a cool period, shouldn't natural warming be expected?</p><p></p><p>Not faux news regurgitation here, just critical thinking applied with a healthy dose of skepticism.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="farmerbyron, post: 2826493, member: 4953"] But you can find plenty of data to advocate for more gun control. It is only your perspective on the issue that makes you see the data you want to see. There is credible data on opposing sides of about any issue. Your bias will dictate which data you favor. I'm a big advocate for science but any of the solutions presented to combat GW are economic in nature and would not make a significant impact on a reduction in warming. Plus our high resolution dataset is so small at this point, how the hell do we even know what normal is? We just came out of a little ice age a mere century ago so if our baseline of high quality data starts at the end of a cool period, shouldn't natural warming be expected? Not faux news regurgitation here, just critical thinking applied with a healthy dose of skepticism. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
EXCLUSIVE: NOAA Relies On Compromised Thermometers That Inflate US Warming Trend
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom