Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
EXCLUSIVE: NOAA Relies On Compromised Thermometers That Inflate US Warming Trend
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JD8" data-source="post: 2826496" data-attributes="member: 24"><p>You bring up very good points. A fluctuation in temperature and conditions IS normal, and more drastic ones have happened but shown to have happened over a significant period of time. The speed at which they are occuring is the variable here. </p><p></p><p>Also, in terms of data FOR gun control is easily disproven as all of the data I've seen that provides backing is filled with cherry picking and junk science at best. All data is not the same, nor is the method by which it was gathered. So I'm going to have to disagree that credible data lies on both sides of any issue. Rather the amount of repeatable results within each subject at the very least, can be very different.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JD8, post: 2826496, member: 24"] You bring up very good points. A fluctuation in temperature and conditions IS normal, and more drastic ones have happened but shown to have happened over a significant period of time. The speed at which they are occuring is the variable here. Also, in terms of data FOR gun control is easily disproven as all of the data I've seen that provides backing is filled with cherry picking and junk science at best. All data is not the same, nor is the method by which it was gathered. So I'm going to have to disagree that credible data lies on both sides of any issue. Rather the amount of repeatable results within each subject at the very least, can be very different. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
EXCLUSIVE: NOAA Relies On Compromised Thermometers That Inflate US Warming Trend
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom