Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Finally the smoking gun in the Clinton email scandal
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Riley" data-source="post: 2910051" data-attributes="member: 29196"><p>While this should be the "last straw" it seems the Bureau of Ineptness already gave at least 5 high ranking aids at least qualified immunity.</p><p></p><p>Supposedly this was done to secure evidence instead of a more usual demand and search orders if perishable. Not usually the case with hardware but it is her highness being protected... </p><p></p><p>Crib notes for those of short attention span....</p><p></p><p>"As the Associated Press puts it: “By including the emails recovered from the laptops in the immunity agreements, the Justice Department exempted key physical evidence from any potential criminal case against [Hillary Clinton’s] aides.” It makes no sense to have done this … unless the Justice Department had already decided it would not prosecute Mills and Samuelson, no matter what the proof showed."</p><p></p><p>"Add this to an already long list of startling concessions made to Mrs. Clinton and her confederates. The latest revelations raise other new questions that I will deal with in subsequent posts. For now, suffice it to say, yet again: It appears the Obama Justice Department’s goal was not to make a prosecutable case, but to make it appear that Hillary Clinton was “exonerated” after a thorough FBI investigation."</p><p></p><p>Read more at: <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/440370/why-did-obama-justice-department-grant-cheryl-mills-immunity" target="_blank">http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/440370/why-did-obama-justice-department-grant-cheryl-mills-immunity</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Riley, post: 2910051, member: 29196"] While this should be the "last straw" it seems the Bureau of Ineptness already gave at least 5 high ranking aids at least qualified immunity. Supposedly this was done to secure evidence instead of a more usual demand and search orders if perishable. Not usually the case with hardware but it is her highness being protected... Crib notes for those of short attention span.... "As the Associated Press puts it: “By including the emails recovered from the laptops in the immunity agreements, the Justice Department exempted key physical evidence from any potential criminal case against [Hillary Clinton’s] aides.” It makes no sense to have done this … unless the Justice Department had already decided it would not prosecute Mills and Samuelson, no matter what the proof showed." "Add this to an already long list of startling concessions made to Mrs. Clinton and her confederates. The latest revelations raise other new questions that I will deal with in subsequent posts. For now, suffice it to say, yet again: It appears the Obama Justice Department’s goal was not to make a prosecutable case, but to make it appear that Hillary Clinton was “exonerated” after a thorough FBI investigation." Read more at: [URL]http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/440370/why-did-obama-justice-department-grant-cheryl-mills-immunity[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Finally the smoking gun in the Clinton email scandal
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom