Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
Florida - New Permitless Carry for Qualified Citizens Signed into Law - How is this Constitutional Carry?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chuckie" data-source="post: 4010634" data-attributes="member: 42584"><p>I noticed you haven't bothered to answer the question I posed in my comment (#24) above. </p><p>- I can see why because if you answered that the "almost blind" person should be allowed to carry a PDW in public you would be admitting that it was okay to potentially put innocent people at risk, and if you answered no that it would not be okay for an "almost blind" person to carry a PDW in public, then you would be advocating for a 'restriction' (just like 'them') to be placed on 'Constitutional Carry'.</p><p>- My point was that when it comes to " . . . shall not be infringed." it's a bit more complicated that just being in total agreement as it applies to ALL circumstances. I'm trying to get people to stop acting like sheep and start thinking for themselves a little bit instead of just following along with the crowd. </p><p>- I'll bring up another point in that it is the individual <strong>State </strong>that have passed the majority of gun restrictions in our country rather than the <strong>Federal </strong>government (including Congress), yet everyone ignores State governments and rails specifically against the the President, whom other than 'mouthing-off', has actually done absoluty nothing to restrict our gun rights. You and everyone else needs to get out of your media pushed demophobia and start looking at who is REALLY taking away our Constitutional Rights.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chuckie, post: 4010634, member: 42584"] I noticed you haven't bothered to answer the question I posed in my comment (#24) above. - I can see why because if you answered that the "almost blind" person should be allowed to carry a PDW in public you would be admitting that it was okay to potentially put innocent people at risk, and if you answered no that it would not be okay for an "almost blind" person to carry a PDW in public, then you would be advocating for a 'restriction' (just like 'them') to be placed on 'Constitutional Carry'. - My point was that when it comes to " . . . shall not be infringed." it's a bit more complicated that just being in total agreement as it applies to ALL circumstances. I'm trying to get people to stop acting like sheep and start thinking for themselves a little bit instead of just following along with the crowd. - I'll bring up another point in that it is the individual [B]State [/B]that have passed the majority of gun restrictions in our country rather than the [B]Federal [/B]government (including Congress), yet everyone ignores State governments and rails specifically against the the President, whom other than 'mouthing-off', has actually done absoluty nothing to restrict our gun rights. You and everyone else needs to get out of your media pushed demophobia and start looking at who is REALLY taking away our Constitutional Rights. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
Florida - New Permitless Carry for Qualified Citizens Signed into Law - How is this Constitutional Carry?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom