Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Gov. Stitt declares Oklahoma special election for recreational marijuana vote
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JD8" data-source="post: 3885354" data-attributes="member: 24"><p>How did you see his posts when he's on your ignore list?</p><p></p><p>You're kind of digging yourself in hole here with your ignorance, or arrogance, however you want to look at it.</p><p></p><p>The Polygraph Protection Act was passed in 1988</p><p></p><p>The description of which is a pretty common poster that needs to be displayed or accessable to employees. Something that someone who supposedly "led large workforces" should know. Fairly common knowledge.</p><p></p><p>However, in the end, there are too many variables with the polygraph (not just those administering the test) to allow it to be reliable in "telling the truth." This has been proven several times over and that's why it's not admissible in a court of law or especially in this case, within the private sector from an HR standpoint.</p><p></p><p>Hope this helps and that you learned something today. Might as well take me off ignore, it will save you a few clicks.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JD8, post: 3885354, member: 24"] How did you see his posts when he's on your ignore list? You're kind of digging yourself in hole here with your ignorance, or arrogance, however you want to look at it. The Polygraph Protection Act was passed in 1988 The description of which is a pretty common poster that needs to be displayed or accessable to employees. Something that someone who supposedly "led large workforces" should know. Fairly common knowledge. However, in the end, there are too many variables with the polygraph (not just those administering the test) to allow it to be reliable in "telling the truth." This has been proven several times over and that's why it's not admissible in a court of law or especially in this case, within the private sector from an HR standpoint. Hope this helps and that you learned something today. Might as well take me off ignore, it will save you a few clicks. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Gov. Stitt declares Oklahoma special election for recreational marijuana vote
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom