Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
I can report one small Oklahoma victory for gun owners and the 2nd amendment!
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WhiteyMacD" data-source="post: 806368" data-attributes="member: 7633"><p>Section A is stating that the SDA does not force property owners to allow firearms on their property (with the exception of Section B). Big difference between allowing property owners to set their own rules and unlawful carry. Once again, if it was unlawful, their would be an inclusion to prohibited places that states "Where posted". </p><p></p><p>If it were unlawful (under SDA) to carry in "posted areas" not included in 1277, why does it not say it is unlawful (according to SDA)? If the business owner had a hunch, and called the cops, I would think it would be "Cop asks you to leave. if you dont, trespassing."</p><p></p><p>I guess you have your interpretation, I have mine. Only way</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WhiteyMacD, post: 806368, member: 7633"] Section A is stating that the SDA does not force property owners to allow firearms on their property (with the exception of Section B). Big difference between allowing property owners to set their own rules and unlawful carry. Once again, if it was unlawful, their would be an inclusion to prohibited places that states "Where posted". If it were unlawful (under SDA) to carry in "posted areas" not included in 1277, why does it not say it is unlawful (according to SDA)? If the business owner had a hunch, and called the cops, I would think it would be "Cop asks you to leave. if you dont, trespassing." I guess you have your interpretation, I have mine. Only way [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
I can report one small Oklahoma victory for gun owners and the 2nd amendment!
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom