Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Interesting Commentary on Scientific Dating Methods
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TerryMiller" data-source="post: 4258035" data-attributes="member: 7900"><p>To add to the idea of dating, some time back I posted an image of a fossil showing a dinosaur track over a human track. Some others commented something to the effect that one of their children could create a better "fossil" that what I showed.</p><p></p><p>Let's start with an image of the fossil that I posted.</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]475105[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>In addition to this print, there is a river in Texas where a number of dinosaur tracks and human tracks are in the same geological layer. Now, to address any questions, these tracks were "enhanced" by pouring water into all of them so that they would show up better in the photograph. The tracks are in a distinctive left/right pattern.</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]475106[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>And one more item of interest. The picture just above and the one below were all found in the Cretaceous geological layer.</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]475107[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>The Cretaceous layer is associated with the age of the dinosaurs, so with these discoveries, if it is true, could the claims of the scientists of when the dinosaurs died off be accurate?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TerryMiller, post: 4258035, member: 7900"] To add to the idea of dating, some time back I posted an image of a fossil showing a dinosaur track over a human track. Some others commented something to the effect that one of their children could create a better "fossil" that what I showed. Let's start with an image of the fossil that I posted. [ATTACH type="full"]475105[/ATTACH] In addition to this print, there is a river in Texas where a number of dinosaur tracks and human tracks are in the same geological layer. Now, to address any questions, these tracks were "enhanced" by pouring water into all of them so that they would show up better in the photograph. The tracks are in a distinctive left/right pattern. [ATTACH type="full" width="555px"]475106[/ATTACH] And one more item of interest. The picture just above and the one below were all found in the Cretaceous geological layer. [ATTACH type="full" width="558px"]475107[/ATTACH] The Cretaceous layer is associated with the age of the dinosaurs, so with these discoveries, if it is true, could the claims of the scientists of when the dinosaurs died off be accurate? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Interesting Commentary on Scientific Dating Methods
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom