We don't have to assume anything. We can do our own independent analyses...or, if you can't, pay someone (like me!) to do it for you.
Yes, the article above does give his explanation for not sharing it: Only the cognoscenti whom he judges worthy may view it.
Last edited:
Didn't the gov produce several studies that showed gun control did no good?
Why are we dancing around trying to find stats that support a pro-gun position, when libs just ignore them and march on with their anti-gun agenda regardless of what numbers say?
If someone does do some new analysis I hope they include how much alcohol intoxication is involved in shootings; that never seems to come up.
Why are we dancing around trying to find stats that support a pro-gun position, when libs just ignore them and march on with their anti-gun agenda regardless of what numbers say?
If someone does do some new analysis I hope they include how much alcohol intoxication is involved in shootings; that never seems to come up.
Because YukonGlocker is an uber pro liberal. Not even sure why he is still on here.
Wrong...I have just as many issues with liberalism as I do with conservatism. Good luck trying to stereotype me in regard to political ideology.
Similar threads
