Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Kentucky court clerk....
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shadowrider" data-source="post: 2786882" data-attributes="member: 3099"><p>Rick,</p><p></p><p>GTG is right. As many people that gets the application of the 1A wrong I tend to think that this is exactly what it's intent is. .gov can't dictate to a group citing religious grounds which is exactly what this case did. I personally think they got the gay marriage ruling wrong and were simply legislating from the bench and that they went against the majority of the population in doing so. But it is what it is and the recourse to be had was tried and lost unless they can regroup their argument and get it in front of SCOTUS another way, or congress gets off their ass and does it right. Until then this woman doesn't really have a case whether we like it or not...</p><p></p><p>Edit: This is a quote from the O/P's article that was made by this woman's husband. It just goes to show the state we're in but doesn't hold any weight legally speaking.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shadowrider, post: 2786882, member: 3099"] Rick, GTG is right. As many people that gets the application of the 1A wrong I tend to think that this is exactly what it's intent is. .gov can't dictate to a group citing religious grounds which is exactly what this case did. I personally think they got the gay marriage ruling wrong and were simply legislating from the bench and that they went against the majority of the population in doing so. But it is what it is and the recourse to be had was tried and lost unless they can regroup their argument and get it in front of SCOTUS another way, or congress gets off their ass and does it right. Until then this woman doesn't really have a case whether we like it or not... Edit: This is a quote from the O/P's article that was made by this woman's husband. It just goes to show the state we're in but doesn't hold any weight legally speaking. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Kentucky court clerk....
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom