Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
OC Arrest
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MyMonkey" data-source="post: 1996570" data-attributes="member: 3945"><p>Much speculation and innuendo in this thread. <img src="/images/smilies/image351.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":kiss:" title="Image351 :kiss:" data-shortname=":kiss:" /> Can't wait to see what Mr. Prater thinks and the Courts support. My approach would be that this was simply trespassing if I was his Defense. I would rely on the argument that the building was not a proscribed carry location and that it was not a sufficient connection to the state arm to qualify as such. I would reference the massive use of churches as support to show that that is a big no no under our Constitution and as such these momentary uses of a quasi political function do not make such buildings a proscribed place. Would necessitate the slippery slope curtailing approach as well in order to prevent our Gubment from slapping their ownership on everything during times of elections. Just my .02.</p><p></p><p>So can't wait to see what Prater does. Such a great man who really thinks things through.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MyMonkey, post: 1996570, member: 3945"] Much speculation and innuendo in this thread. :kiss: Can't wait to see what Mr. Prater thinks and the Courts support. My approach would be that this was simply trespassing if I was his Defense. I would rely on the argument that the building was not a proscribed carry location and that it was not a sufficient connection to the state arm to qualify as such. I would reference the massive use of churches as support to show that that is a big no no under our Constitution and as such these momentary uses of a quasi political function do not make such buildings a proscribed place. Would necessitate the slippery slope curtailing approach as well in order to prevent our Gubment from slapping their ownership on everything during times of elections. Just my .02. So can't wait to see what Prater does. Such a great man who really thinks things through. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
OC Arrest
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom