Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
OFFICIAL OSA PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION (prediction) POLL / Giveaway
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ignerntbend" data-source="post: 1978292" data-attributes="member: 6981"><p>In 2004 we were conviced that the polls were skewed. The pollsters were relying too heavily on land lines when so many people had gone to cell phones. The polls were over sampling Republicans. It was an outrage. The polls just couldn't be true.</p><p></p><p>Well, here we are again. The math nerds are in the corner with their sharp pencils.</p><p></p><p>Broncobama 332</p><p>Mich Romney 206</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ignerntbend, post: 1978292, member: 6981"] In 2004 we were conviced that the polls were skewed. The pollsters were relying too heavily on land lines when so many people had gone to cell phones. The polls were over sampling Republicans. It was an outrage. The polls just couldn't be true. Well, here we are again. The math nerds are in the corner with their sharp pencils. Broncobama 332 Mich Romney 206 [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
OFFICIAL OSA PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION (prediction) POLL / Giveaway
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom