Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Report: Thousands Of Suspects In Baltimore Arrests Required Medical Attention
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MadDogs" data-source="post: 2746943" data-attributes="member: 11175"><p>One would have to be south of immature to let a few bad cops color the actions of all cops &#8230; or really bad with basic math to the point of never even been in the zip code of a school that teaches statistics.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I would assume that you would like to seek the truth as to why this waiting period is done. If so, you might try some research. Note part regarding "alternatives". </p><p></p><p><a href="http://leb.fbi.gov/2013/september/criminal-interrogations-of-police-officers-after-use-of-force-incidents" target="_blank">http://leb.fbi.gov/2013/september/criminal-interrogations-of-police-officers-after-use-of-force-incidents</a></p><p></p><p>BTW &#8230; Can you explain what you meant by the “apparent rate of malfeasance” is in real (not “apparent”) terms? </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>One should look at any “claim” with an open mind to evaluate the facts. If one has proof that this is not being done &#8230; proof that is credible and can be validated &#8230; then that should be brought to point via a fact based analysis. On he flip side, sans fact generalizations and shrill assumptions without performing due diligence in research is not demonstrating “critical thinking” much less “clear thinking” &#8230; well, unless one is simply bellied up at the bar at Hudson’s Pub. There one can simply argue what they find "apparent". </p><p></p><p>You seem to be emotionally tied to this. Care to unpack why?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MadDogs, post: 2746943, member: 11175"] One would have to be south of immature to let a few bad cops color the actions of all cops … or really bad with basic math to the point of never even been in the zip code of a school that teaches statistics. I would assume that you would like to seek the truth as to why this waiting period is done. If so, you might try some research. Note part regarding "alternatives". [url]http://leb.fbi.gov/2013/september/criminal-interrogations-of-police-officers-after-use-of-force-incidents[/url] BTW … Can you explain what you meant by the “apparent rate of malfeasance” is in real (not “apparent”) terms? One should look at any “claim” with an open mind to evaluate the facts. If one has proof that this is not being done … proof that is credible and can be validated … then that should be brought to point via a fact based analysis. On he flip side, sans fact generalizations and shrill assumptions without performing due diligence in research is not demonstrating “critical thinking” much less “clear thinking” … well, unless one is simply bellied up at the bar at Hudson’s Pub. There one can simply argue what they find "apparent". You seem to be emotionally tied to this. Care to unpack why? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Report: Thousands Of Suspects In Baltimore Arrests Required Medical Attention
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom