Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Sandy Hook Families' Lawsuit Against Gun Companies Can Move Forward
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ace_on_the_Turn" data-source="post: 2871476" data-attributes="member: 27417"><p>The lawsuit is based on the following wording in the federal law (Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act):</p><p></p><p>(2) To preserve a citizen's access to a supply of firearms and ammunition for all lawful purposes, including hunting, self-defense, collecting, and competitive or recreational shooting.</p><p></p><p>The lawsuit claims, quite ridiculously, that the AR-15 is a military weapon. That is does not have any legitimate civilian use. </p><p><img src="https://www.okshooters.com/data/MetaMirrorCache/i939.photobucket.com_albums_ad231_nightowl2255_OSA30_zpsgrysorv3.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /> </p><p></p><p>The real "villain" in this case is U.S. District Judge Robert Chatigny (a Clinton appointee) who remanded the case back to state court (without issuing an opinion as to why) instead of simply ruling the case to be merit-less and dismissing it. At some point it will be thrown out. May even be on appeal after the plaintiffs win in state court, but it will be dismissed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ace_on_the_Turn, post: 2871476, member: 27417"] The lawsuit is based on the following wording in the federal law (Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act): (2) To preserve a citizen's access to a supply of firearms and ammunition for all lawful purposes, including hunting, self-defense, collecting, and competitive or recreational shooting. The lawsuit claims, quite ridiculously, that the AR-15 is a military weapon. That is does not have any legitimate civilian use. [IMG]https://www.okshooters.com/data/MetaMirrorCache/i939.photobucket.com_albums_ad231_nightowl2255_OSA30_zpsgrysorv3.jpg[/IMG] The real "villain" in this case is U.S. District Judge Robert Chatigny (a Clinton appointee) who remanded the case back to state court (without issuing an opinion as to why) instead of simply ruling the case to be merit-less and dismissing it. At some point it will be thrown out. May even be on appeal after the plaintiffs win in state court, but it will be dismissed. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Sandy Hook Families' Lawsuit Against Gun Companies Can Move Forward
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom