Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
She signed it, fellas
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Werewolf" data-source="post: 1795922" data-attributes="member: 239"><p>What J.B. was doing can only loosely be described as sarcasm. What he was doing was attacking the concerns of some OSA members re: the MWC PD's stance on OC by denigrating those self same opinions without addressing those opinions with reason and logic.</p><p></p><p>I don't blame him for that. It's what lawyers are trained to do - can't win with reason, logic and evidence attack the motives and opinions with emotion. I had an Uncle who spent 20 years as a DA and another 20 as a Defense Attorney down in TX. We used to argue methods all the time. He wasn't above taking the same tack if it meant convicting a defendant when he was a DA or getting one off when he was a practicing Defense Attorney. Hell - he tried the same thing on me all the time and it usually worked.</p><p></p><p>That said J.B. is now a moderator. One would think that they at least would be above such methods.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Werewolf, post: 1795922, member: 239"] What J.B. was doing can only loosely be described as sarcasm. What he was doing was attacking the concerns of some OSA members re: the MWC PD's stance on OC by denigrating those self same opinions without addressing those opinions with reason and logic. I don't blame him for that. It's what lawyers are trained to do - can't win with reason, logic and evidence attack the motives and opinions with emotion. I had an Uncle who spent 20 years as a DA and another 20 as a Defense Attorney down in TX. We used to argue methods all the time. He wasn't above taking the same tack if it meant convicting a defendant when he was a DA or getting one off when he was a practicing Defense Attorney. Hell - he tried the same thing on me all the time and it usually worked. That said J.B. is now a moderator. One would think that they at least would be above such methods. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
She signed it, fellas
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom