Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Signs and people with signs impeach obama this morning
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="vvvvvvv" data-source="post: 2269127" data-attributes="member: 5151"><p>#1 - The ball is still up in the air legally, but pretty telling is the phrase "Obama calls them Czars" which tells me that the particular site doesn't really care about facts.</p><p></p><p>#2 - When was Obamacare declared to be unconstitutional and an injunction issued?</p><p></p><p>#3 - Nothing illegal here. And certainly nothing unconstitutional.</p><p></p><p>#4 - "Several" means "one"? This also completely mischaracterizes the subject that it seems to be talking about.</p><p></p><p>#5 - Pesky legislative delegation...</p><p></p><p>#6 - No evidence cited. Just more baseless rhetoric.</p><p></p><p>#7 - Completely false. The US did not join those foreign countries - those foreign countries filed briefs in support of the US argument. Should the federal government drop a case solely because a foreign government supports the federal government's position?</p><p></p><p>#8 - No evidence cited. Only thing that comes up in searches are chain letters full of BS rhetoric.</p><p></p><p>#9 - How is a SCOTUS ruling a unilateral action by the President?</p><p></p><p>#10 - And the evidence that the President was knowledgeable and involved is?</p><p></p><p>#11 - Pesky legislative delegation...</p><p></p><p>#12 - Citations, please.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>----</p><p></p><p>Pretty much the definition of "low-information voters".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="vvvvvvv, post: 2269127, member: 5151"] #1 - The ball is still up in the air legally, but pretty telling is the phrase "Obama calls them Czars" which tells me that the particular site doesn't really care about facts. #2 - When was Obamacare declared to be unconstitutional and an injunction issued? #3 - Nothing illegal here. And certainly nothing unconstitutional. #4 - "Several" means "one"? This also completely mischaracterizes the subject that it seems to be talking about. #5 - Pesky legislative delegation... #6 - No evidence cited. Just more baseless rhetoric. #7 - Completely false. The US did not join those foreign countries - those foreign countries filed briefs in support of the US argument. Should the federal government drop a case solely because a foreign government supports the federal government's position? #8 - No evidence cited. Only thing that comes up in searches are chain letters full of BS rhetoric. #9 - How is a SCOTUS ruling a unilateral action by the President? #10 - And the evidence that the President was knowledgeable and involved is? #11 - Pesky legislative delegation... #12 - Citations, please. ---- Pretty much the definition of "low-information voters". [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Signs and people with signs impeach obama this morning
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom