Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
State Question 777
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CHenry" data-source="post: 2916868" data-attributes="member: 6281"><p>Then I found this article and it has YES written all over it.</p><p><a href="http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/capitol_report/oklahoma-senate-passes-right-to-farm-bill/article_f30b73a0-7e89-5dbc-b622-076df5c1e5c7.html" target="_blank">http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/capitol_report/oklahoma-senate-passes-right-to-farm-bill/article_f30b73a0-7e89-5dbc-b622-076df5c1e5c7.html</a></p><p></p><p>However, it would seem its written to fool the voters. As was Citizens United. </p><p>This protects "farming practices" which means Monsanto can keep using their genetically modified seeds - in case you dont know it, from what I understand, these seeds will eventually be forced on the small farmers to purchase each year because the seeds that will grow from the plant are sterile. Then Monsanto has the farmers by the balls and will charge them out the wazzoo for seeds. Its already happening in ND where another buddy of mine farms about 30,000 acres and now hes set up a seed business and hes making huge bank.</p><p></p><p>Read the comments. </p><p>This comment struck a home run. I'm voting HELL NO.</p><p>"This has nothing to protect the right to farm..it is to protect the right of Monsanto to profit from their genetically Modified seed(they produce their own Roundup!).This is to give more and more rights for Con Agra,Cargill,ADM to ruin our soils,air and water to export to countries that are turning into deserts from Global warming..Fascism is here...Tea Party Repubs are for Corporate rule and they are dangerous..Happy Earth Day"</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CHenry, post: 2916868, member: 6281"] Then I found this article and it has YES written all over it. [URL]http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/capitol_report/oklahoma-senate-passes-right-to-farm-bill/article_f30b73a0-7e89-5dbc-b622-076df5c1e5c7.html[/URL] However, it would seem its written to fool the voters. As was Citizens United. This protects "farming practices" which means Monsanto can keep using their genetically modified seeds - in case you dont know it, from what I understand, these seeds will eventually be forced on the small farmers to purchase each year because the seeds that will grow from the plant are sterile. Then Monsanto has the farmers by the balls and will charge them out the wazzoo for seeds. Its already happening in ND where another buddy of mine farms about 30,000 acres and now hes set up a seed business and hes making huge bank. Read the comments. This comment struck a home run. I'm voting HELL NO. "This has nothing to protect the right to farm..it is to protect the right of Monsanto to profit from their genetically Modified seed(they produce their own Roundup!).This is to give more and more rights for Con Agra,Cargill,ADM to ruin our soils,air and water to export to countries that are turning into deserts from Global warming..Fascism is here...Tea Party Repubs are for Corporate rule and they are dangerous..Happy Earth Day" [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
State Question 777
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom