Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
State Questions
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dennishoddy" data-source="post: 2922484" data-attributes="member: 5412"><p>His issue is that his county/office will loose money in fines, etc. The "drug free" Bull crap around schools and parks, etc was designed to be able to stack charges for more money/fines. </p><p>Its all about the money is why the county/local offices are against it. Confiscated drug money and assets fund their offices. </p><p>I'm not a drug user, never had a joint in my life, but I can recognize why they want to keep 780 on the books, and its not right.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dennishoddy, post: 2922484, member: 5412"] His issue is that his county/office will loose money in fines, etc. The "drug free" Bull crap around schools and parks, etc was designed to be able to stack charges for more money/fines. Its all about the money is why the county/local offices are against it. Confiscated drug money and assets fund their offices. I'm not a drug user, never had a joint in my life, but I can recognize why they want to keep 780 on the books, and its not right. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
State Questions
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom