Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Supreme Court Upholds Gun Ban for Misdemeanor Domestic Violence
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="POKE1911" data-source="post: 2887507" data-attributes="member: 24536"><p>A family member of mine was married to a woman that was mentally ill. She went to the county sheriff looking to press charges for bruising that occurred during an altercation. I know this did not happen as it is not part of his nature, furthermore, I was WITH him at the time the incident was said to have taken place. Needless to say, nothing came about that.</p><p></p><p>Now to think, if this happened to him it could happen to anyone. He was fortunate that he lived in a town in which the Sherif knows both him and her and also that I was with him at the time that this supposedly went down. To think now he could have lost his constitutional right and joy of owning firearms, based largely on a false accusation of crazy person... That is not right. </p><p></p><p>I don't know what the answer is, but this is not it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="POKE1911, post: 2887507, member: 24536"] A family member of mine was married to a woman that was mentally ill. She went to the county sheriff looking to press charges for bruising that occurred during an altercation. I know this did not happen as it is not part of his nature, furthermore, I was WITH him at the time the incident was said to have taken place. Needless to say, nothing came about that. Now to think, if this happened to him it could happen to anyone. He was fortunate that he lived in a town in which the Sherif knows both him and her and also that I was with him at the time that this supposedly went down. To think now he could have lost his constitutional right and joy of owning firearms, based largely on a false accusation of crazy person... That is not right. I don't know what the answer is, but this is not it. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Supreme Court Upholds Gun Ban for Misdemeanor Domestic Violence
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom