Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Texas allows guns in college classrooms under new law
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MadDogs" data-source="post: 2896866" data-attributes="member: 11175"><p>When you wanted to “bet pay checks” over some nonsensical anti-gun stats you quoted and during the course of the thread I told you to grow up and take a “remedial writing course” … ring a bell? Other than criticizing your prose I have no clue as to why you banned me. Given your lack of response to the “racism” of the Republican platform I guess it was kind of silly of me to expect an explanation.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I was using Lurker as the benchmark to show a lack of credibility and integrity. Thinking about it … you might be right. Lurker would at least try to back his comments up. Now, that said it would typically be in some mutated form of Ebonics but at least he tried to back up what he said. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Because you can’t does come to mind. But feel free to elaborate beyond an emoji.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So you do or you don’t mind me “criticizing your posts” all I want? </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yet you have made six to eight paragraphs in comments and posts since? You made a statement that there is institutionalized racism in the Republican Party. You called people “racists” and your reply is that you don’t have time to explain why? </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Kind of like what you were asked to do? You were asked to clarify and provide examples. You ran away from that yet you asked others to clarify. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, I guess since you asked … when people call other people shrill names like “racist” due to some sans-fact ideological bend it is (to me) problematic. Trying to whiz backwards and say “I don’t have time” to back up my shrill name calling is somewhat amusing more so than problematic. </p><p></p><p>Let’s go back to the original question. Can you provide two examples of the institutionalized racism of the Republican Party platform? Seriously people "don't know what they don't know" so if you can provide two examples, great. But when you don't ... you probably should expect someone to "criticize" your posts.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MadDogs, post: 2896866, member: 11175"] When you wanted to “bet pay checks” over some nonsensical anti-gun stats you quoted and during the course of the thread I told you to grow up and take a “remedial writing course” … ring a bell? Other than criticizing your prose I have no clue as to why you banned me. Given your lack of response to the “racism” of the Republican platform I guess it was kind of silly of me to expect an explanation. I was using Lurker as the benchmark to show a lack of credibility and integrity. Thinking about it … you might be right. Lurker would at least try to back his comments up. Now, that said it would typically be in some mutated form of Ebonics but at least he tried to back up what he said. Because you can’t does come to mind. But feel free to elaborate beyond an emoji. So you do or you don’t mind me “criticizing your posts” all I want? Yet you have made six to eight paragraphs in comments and posts since? You made a statement that there is institutionalized racism in the Republican Party. You called people “racists” and your reply is that you don’t have time to explain why? Kind of like what you were asked to do? You were asked to clarify and provide examples. You ran away from that yet you asked others to clarify. Well, I guess since you asked … when people call other people shrill names like “racist” due to some sans-fact ideological bend it is (to me) problematic. Trying to whiz backwards and say “I don’t have time” to back up my shrill name calling is somewhat amusing more so than problematic. Let’s go back to the original question. Can you provide two examples of the institutionalized racism of the Republican Party platform? Seriously people "don't know what they don't know" so if you can provide two examples, great. But when you don't ... you probably should expect someone to "criticize" your posts. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Texas allows guns in college classrooms under new law
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom