Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Unconstitutional Oklahoma House of Reps Committee Kills Open Carry Bill
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jefpainthorse" data-source="post: 1513271" data-attributes="member: 11766"><p>Here is the Editorial (No Scanner... and I've stopped about a 'graph short, he tries to logic Campus carry to the concerns ove SDA years ago)</p><p></p><p>"<em>When are We Going to Trust SDA Holders?" by Charles H. Smith Executive Director ORA</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>This year witnessed a large increase in the number of bills relating to the firearms and sportsman's issues in the Oklahoma Legislature. I the past there would only be from five to ten bills to monitor. This year there have been thirty ot forty bills introduced.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>It is apparent that everyone wants to be a freind of the Second Amendment. There is, however, one particular proposition that is failing to gain proper consideration.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>I believe it is time to start looking at a problem our legislature refuses to adequately address.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>It is time to review our self-defense law, "concealed carry", and come down on the side of the average law abiding citizen who possesses and Oklahoma Self Defense license.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Holders of the OK SDA go through a series of requirements to obtain such a licence. They must go through training for firearms safety,the law, and are more thoroughly checked out than some indivduals becoming law enforcement officers. </em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>SDA has been a very good law. Ten years of history supports this. Yet the individuals who obtain an SDA license are not fully trusted by the state. Just look at some of the probhitions against places where they are not allowed to carry personal protection firearms.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Have you noted every time a law is proposed for Carry on Campus? Get ready for the outcry from the elites in acadaemia. In other instances...</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em></em></p><p> </p><p>Well ...you get the point. He really just kinda sorta comes out half heartedly endorsing Campus carry sorta....maybe.</p><p></p><p>But his last sentence is telling, "When are we going to start adressing the concerns of law abiding Oklahomans an trusting them?"</p><p></p><p>I did note the "Sharpshooter" ran several inches of copy about carry without permits in other states.</p><p></p><p>So.... I guess my mind found more endorsment than I though. Sounds like they are trying to play it both ways and speak as politicians - saying little of nothing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jefpainthorse, post: 1513271, member: 11766"] Here is the Editorial (No Scanner... and I've stopped about a 'graph short, he tries to logic Campus carry to the concerns ove SDA years ago) "[I]When are We Going to Trust SDA Holders?" by Charles H. Smith Executive Director ORA This year witnessed a large increase in the number of bills relating to the firearms and sportsman's issues in the Oklahoma Legislature. I the past there would only be from five to ten bills to monitor. This year there have been thirty ot forty bills introduced. It is apparent that everyone wants to be a freind of the Second Amendment. There is, however, one particular proposition that is failing to gain proper consideration. I believe it is time to start looking at a problem our legislature refuses to adequately address. It is time to review our self-defense law, "concealed carry", and come down on the side of the average law abiding citizen who possesses and Oklahoma Self Defense license. Holders of the OK SDA go through a series of requirements to obtain such a licence. They must go through training for firearms safety,the law, and are more thoroughly checked out than some indivduals becoming law enforcement officers. SDA has been a very good law. Ten years of history supports this. Yet the individuals who obtain an SDA license are not fully trusted by the state. Just look at some of the probhitions against places where they are not allowed to carry personal protection firearms. Have you noted every time a law is proposed for Carry on Campus? Get ready for the outcry from the elites in acadaemia. In other instances... [/I] Well ...you get the point. He really just kinda sorta comes out half heartedly endorsing Campus carry sorta....maybe. But his last sentence is telling, "When are we going to start adressing the concerns of law abiding Oklahomans an trusting them?" I did note the "Sharpshooter" ran several inches of copy about carry without permits in other states. So.... I guess my mind found more endorsment than I though. Sounds like they are trying to play it both ways and speak as politicians - saying little of nothing. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Unconstitutional Oklahoma House of Reps Committee Kills Open Carry Bill
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom