Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Voting in/out Judges
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mons meg" data-source="post: 1980079" data-attributes="member: 90"><p>I think we need to do away with the judicial retention system completely and either go back to pre-1967 partisan elections, or convert to a state level system of gubernatorial permanent appointments and do away with the farcical show. Requiring judges to stand for retention, when IIRC there's not one example of a judge ever being "un-retained" in 40 something years is maybe a clue.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mons meg, post: 1980079, member: 90"] I think we need to do away with the judicial retention system completely and either go back to pre-1967 partisan elections, or convert to a state level system of gubernatorial permanent appointments and do away with the farcical show. Requiring judges to stand for retention, when IIRC there's not one example of a judge ever being "un-retained" in 40 something years is maybe a clue. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Voting in/out Judges
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom