Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
What are the best Made in the USA 1911s?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BrandonMF" data-source="post: 2806025" data-attributes="member: 13086"><p>Colt XSE.</p><p></p><p>Before I begin my explanation let me just get two things out of the way...</p><p>One, Now when I say to spec, I mean both in materials and dimensions. You will not find a 1911 to 100% armory spec being built anywhere in the United States just because the price would be way higher than people would pay. So in the context of this, when I say, "Spec", I am speaking on dimensions and geometry of the design as well as ensuring the gun is assembled as close to the original as possible.</p><p></p><p>Two, MIM parts are fine. MIM is a friggin' awesome process and produces great quality parts with some pretty outstanding durability. But when it comes to 1911, I prefer as few MIM parts as possible. NOt because they make the gun run bad, but because it's not DESIGNED to have any goddamned MIM parts. But that is entirely personal preference and there is nothing wrong with MIM, especially considering that the money saved using MIM parts goes directly to the consumer, which is why there's a hundred and fifty dollar difference between the Loaded and the XSE, on average.</p><p></p><p>People will may disagree, but an XSE is probably about the best you're going to get in that range. Kick it up to around 900 for a total and order from Buds.</p><p></p><p>When you're talking about 1911s, the important thing is to stay within spec. The problem is that most companies violate the hell out of spec anymore. For example, Kimbers. Everyone goes gaga over kimbers and people hold them up as an example of what a 1911 either should be or as an example of the problems inherit in 1911s and there tends to not be a lot of middle ground. The problem with Kimber is that they use a Schwarz safety system which can be a tad problematic and can wear out over time. Not to spec, I'm not interested.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Next is Remington. I COULD be wrong, but as far as I know, Remington frames are cast, which to me was a deal breaker. Great 1911s and people tend to love them but, meh.</p><p></p><p>Springfield is next. I love Springfields, but I hate their ******** glued-in ejector block. I don't care if the FB goddamned I thought it was a great idea to glue them in with blue loctite so HRT could do a field expedient fix with friggin' glue, that's not to spec, and it's friggin' stupid. I don't like that their goddamned glue, or their copious use of MIM parts, I hate the fact that the same inferior parts on their 600 dollar Mil-Spec are in their 1000 Loaded Operator and their 1500 TRPs. They're great guns, though, really. </p><p></p><p>Now the Colt, even, isn't truly to spec, and if I can help it I will always choose a Series 70 over an 80 just for the simple fact that is how the goddamned gun is supposed to be made and it's slightly easier to find parts that work with it. However, the Series 80 isn't a problem at all in my experience. Now the dimensions are generally fairly correct on the Colt, everything that's SUPPOSED to be pinned is pinned and it has the least amount of MIM parts in any production 1911. They cut corners in some places and you gotta watch out and do your research because I know for a fact early Rail Guns had a dovetail too far back which wouldn't allow you to properly install aftermarket sights. Not sure about the XSE but that's the kind of BS they like to pull.</p><p></p><p>XSE Pros</p><p></p><p>In your price range.</p><p></p><p>Dimensions on the Colt tend to be pretty close to spec, considering they're built on the tooling that made the very first ones.</p><p></p><p>Everything is done right. No BS corner cutting. No MIM parts. The differences where it deviates from spec are improvements, IE The trigger guard relief cut, firing pin/drop safety, ambi safeties, etc.</p><p></p><p>Cons</p><p></p><p>The sights are not night sights. Springfield knocks their panties off here.</p><p></p><p>Plastic mainspring housing. So there's one corner cut, but it's not something that effects function of the gun, like a retarded glued in ejector.</p><p></p><p>Price. You're not going to notice much of a difference with MIM parts. Really. You won't. I promise. and if something does break, it's cheap to replace. So that said, the extra money you could save on the Loaded could be a pro.</p><p></p><p>So there you go. That's my opinion, and that's formed from three GIs, two Milspecs, two Loaded, a Combat Commander and a Colt Rail Gun. The only two 1911s I still have in my safe are Colts. <img src="/images/smilies/anyone.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":anyone:" title="Anyone :anyone:" data-shortname=":anyone:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BrandonMF, post: 2806025, member: 13086"] Colt XSE. Before I begin my explanation let me just get two things out of the way... One, Now when I say to spec, I mean both in materials and dimensions. You will not find a 1911 to 100% armory spec being built anywhere in the United States just because the price would be way higher than people would pay. So in the context of this, when I say, "Spec", I am speaking on dimensions and geometry of the design as well as ensuring the gun is assembled as close to the original as possible. Two, MIM parts are fine. MIM is a friggin' awesome process and produces great quality parts with some pretty outstanding durability. But when it comes to 1911, I prefer as few MIM parts as possible. NOt because they make the gun run bad, but because it's not DESIGNED to have any goddamned MIM parts. But that is entirely personal preference and there is nothing wrong with MIM, especially considering that the money saved using MIM parts goes directly to the consumer, which is why there's a hundred and fifty dollar difference between the Loaded and the XSE, on average. People will may disagree, but an XSE is probably about the best you're going to get in that range. Kick it up to around 900 for a total and order from Buds. When you're talking about 1911s, the important thing is to stay within spec. The problem is that most companies violate the hell out of spec anymore. For example, Kimbers. Everyone goes gaga over kimbers and people hold them up as an example of what a 1911 either should be or as an example of the problems inherit in 1911s and there tends to not be a lot of middle ground. The problem with Kimber is that they use a Schwarz safety system which can be a tad problematic and can wear out over time. Not to spec, I'm not interested. Next is Remington. I COULD be wrong, but as far as I know, Remington frames are cast, which to me was a deal breaker. Great 1911s and people tend to love them but, meh. Springfield is next. I love Springfields, but I hate their ******** glued-in ejector block. I don't care if the FB goddamned I thought it was a great idea to glue them in with blue loctite so HRT could do a field expedient fix with friggin' glue, that's not to spec, and it's friggin' stupid. I don't like that their goddamned glue, or their copious use of MIM parts, I hate the fact that the same inferior parts on their 600 dollar Mil-Spec are in their 1000 Loaded Operator and their 1500 TRPs. They're great guns, though, really. Now the Colt, even, isn't truly to spec, and if I can help it I will always choose a Series 70 over an 80 just for the simple fact that is how the goddamned gun is supposed to be made and it's slightly easier to find parts that work with it. However, the Series 80 isn't a problem at all in my experience. Now the dimensions are generally fairly correct on the Colt, everything that's SUPPOSED to be pinned is pinned and it has the least amount of MIM parts in any production 1911. They cut corners in some places and you gotta watch out and do your research because I know for a fact early Rail Guns had a dovetail too far back which wouldn't allow you to properly install aftermarket sights. Not sure about the XSE but that's the kind of BS they like to pull. XSE Pros In your price range. Dimensions on the Colt tend to be pretty close to spec, considering they're built on the tooling that made the very first ones. Everything is done right. No BS corner cutting. No MIM parts. The differences where it deviates from spec are improvements, IE The trigger guard relief cut, firing pin/drop safety, ambi safeties, etc. Cons The sights are not night sights. Springfield knocks their panties off here. Plastic mainspring housing. So there's one corner cut, but it's not something that effects function of the gun, like a retarded glued in ejector. Price. You're not going to notice much of a difference with MIM parts. Really. You won't. I promise. and if something does break, it's cheap to replace. So that said, the extra money you could save on the Loaded could be a pro. So there you go. That's my opinion, and that's formed from three GIs, two Milspecs, two Loaded, a Combat Commander and a Colt Rail Gun. The only two 1911s I still have in my safe are Colts. :anyone: [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
What are the best Made in the USA 1911s?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom