Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Which one of you was it?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Coded-Dude" data-source="post: 2074338" data-attributes="member: 16918"><p>Wasn't there a case on this. Can't remember the name or what happened, but I remember someone suing....</p><p></p><p>[EDIT]</p><p></p><p><em>Bonidy v. United States Postal Service</em><span style="color: #333333"><span style="font-family: 'Arial'">, No. 10-02408 (D. Colo. filed Oct. 4, 2010), is a challenge to the U.S. Postal Service’s complete ban of firearms on postal service property.</span></span></p><p></p><p>Dismissed - The judge basically stated in his opinion that the plaintiff did not have standing to bring the suit. USPS had a long and established policy of prohibition and the court did not want to analyze the Supreme Courts ruling as to how or why it could be relevant in this case. That was the gist of it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Coded-Dude, post: 2074338, member: 16918"] Wasn't there a case on this. Can't remember the name or what happened, but I remember someone suing.... [EDIT] [I]Bonidy v. United States Postal Service[/I][COLOR=#333333][FONT=Arial], No. 10-02408 (D. Colo. filed Oct. 4, 2010), is a challenge to the U.S. Postal Service’s complete ban of firearms on postal service property.[/FONT][/COLOR] Dismissed - The judge basically stated in his opinion that the plaintiff did not have standing to bring the suit. USPS had a long and established policy of prohibition and the court did not want to analyze the Supreme Courts ruling as to how or why it could be relevant in this case. That was the gist of it. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Which one of you was it?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom