Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Zimmerman's lawyers drop him
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Stephen Cue" data-source="post: 1772204" data-attributes="member: 3008"><p><span style="color: #0000FF">Dude seriously? Im assuming you are reading my posts but are you reading them fully and in context?</span></p><p><span style="color: #0000FF"></span></p><p><span style="color: #0000FF">All of the Fla. law you quoted was NOT SYG, only 776.012. Which did not contradict what I have stated.</span></p><p><span style="color: #0000FF"></span></p><p><span style="color: #0000FF">Section 776.041 is not SYG, that is self-defense when one cannot escape the threat, not deciding to stand and confront the threat.</span></p><p><span style="color: #0000FF"></span></p><p><span style="color: #0000FF">Also, please repost where I said one CANNOT use <strong>SYG</strong> after they retreat, I merely said it is not necessary and does not apply if one is attacked after they retreat....THEY DO NOT NEED SYG BECAUSE THEY RETREATED! </span></p><p><span style="color: #0000FF"></span></p><p><span style="color: #0000FF">SYG ONLY STATES ONE DOES NOT HAVE TO RETREAT!</span></p><p><span style="color: #0000FF"></span></p><p><span style="color: #0000FF">Plus, never said Fla. law was wishing optimistic interpretion. Please re-re-re-re-read my posts!</span></p><p><span style="color: #0000FF"></span></p><p><span style="color: #0000FF">Its seems to me you are looking for a disagreement with me but I cannot find one other than you mis-quoting me.</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Stephen Cue, post: 1772204, member: 3008"] [COLOR="#0000FF"]Dude seriously? Im assuming you are reading my posts but are you reading them fully and in context? All of the Fla. law you quoted was NOT SYG, only 776.012. Which did not contradict what I have stated. Section 776.041 is not SYG, that is self-defense when one cannot escape the threat, not deciding to stand and confront the threat. Also, please repost where I said one CANNOT use [B]SYG[/B] after they retreat, I merely said it is not necessary and does not apply if one is attacked after they retreat....THEY DO NOT NEED SYG BECAUSE THEY RETREATED! SYG ONLY STATES ONE DOES NOT HAVE TO RETREAT! Plus, never said Fla. law was wishing optimistic interpretion. Please re-re-re-re-read my posts! Its seems to me you are looking for a disagreement with me but I cannot find one other than you mis-quoting me.[/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Zimmerman's lawyers drop him
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom