Texas Governor Greg Abbott pardons Daniel Perry after conviction for shooting armed agitator during BLM riots

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Blue Heeler

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Dec 8, 2020
Messages
1,198
Reaction score
1,921
Location
Oklahoma
Leftist cucks and race pimps are losing their minds over the pardon.

Had the person Perry shot been black, Biden’s DOJ would be pursuing civil rights violations … and running a red light.

Good lesson from this … don’t post things on social media like you “might have to shoot a protester” before shooting a protester.
 

TerryMiller

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Jun 4, 2009
Messages
18,980
Reaction score
19,132
Location
Here, but occasionally There.
I believe the extra peaceful pos protestor who did the shooting had the AR?

Link to story about this issue, which also includes the information that the protester had an AK-47.

Texas Gov Greg Abbott Pardons Daniel Perry

"Foster was openly carrying an AK-47 rifle at the time and during the trial, each side presented conflicting accounts as to whether the protester raised the gun to Perry who was also legally armed. Perry shot Foster and then fled the area, police said. He then called police and reported what happened, claiming he shot in self-defense after Foster aimed his weapon at him."
 

hivemind918

Marksman
Supporting Member
Supporter
Joined
Dec 24, 2022
Messages
41
Reaction score
37
Location
Tulsa
Guilt by association, and a party to a crime being committed so imo there never should have been charges brought against the Uber driver. But with the current state of this country and it's judicial system I am not surprised in the least. It's a shame law abiding citizens have to have their name and information spread all over the place by the media when they were simply acting in self defense against these woke extremists, which is potentially putting a target on their back for all of the extremist "peaceful protestor" types they've already had to go through hell for defending themselves from that are itching to become some kind of "hero" within the woke "peaceful protestor" community that want to erase history along with all of our constitutional rights.

Even though Fosters defense was trying to say He wasn't the one who shot at Perry, by law Foster was an accomplice, and if he wanted to remove himself from the category of being an accomplice he should have used that AK of his to put an end to his accomplices attack on the Uber driver instead of choosing to stand by, failing to prevent the commission of the crime.

It's a wild time to be alive
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom