Global Warming: the Fix Is In

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

tomthebaker

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Dec 23, 2006
Messages
2,109
Reaction score
579
Location
owasso-ish
"Nearly all" global warming is fabricated, study finds.

"The conclusive findings of this research are that the three GAST data sets are not a valid representation of reality. In fact, the magnitude of their historical data adjustments, that removed their cyclical temperature patterns, are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data. Thus, it is impossible to conclude from the three published GAST data sets that recent years have been the warmest ever – despite current claims of record setting warming."

http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...ent-global-warming-is-fabricated-study-finds/
 

Ace_on_the_Turn

Sharpshooter
Joined
Jan 24, 2013
Messages
3,775
Reaction score
418
Location
OKC
This BS, again? From bought and paid for shills of the fossil fuel industry no less.

"And so here we go again – American conservatives are denying the very existence of global warming. The claim is based on what can charitably be described as a white paper, written by fossil fuel-funded contrarians Joseph D’Aleo and Craig Idso along with James Wallace III...Both papers are rife with flaws because they start from a desired conclusion – that the science underpinning Endangerment Finding is somehow wrong – and work backwards trying to support it. The paper itself has little scientific content. Using charts taken from climate denier blogs, the authors claim that every temperature record adjustment since the 1980s has been in the warming direction, which is simply false. As Zeke Hausfather pointed out, referencing work by Nick Stokes, roughly half of the adjustments have resulted in cooling and half in warming. Moreover, the net adjustment to the raw data actually reduces the long-term global warming trend."
 

emapples

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Apr 14, 2010
Messages
4,661
Reaction score
3,939
Location
Arrow Repaired
This BS, again? From bought and paid for shills of the fossil fuel industry no less.

"And so here we go again – American conservatives are denying the very existence of global warming. The claim is based on what can charitably be described as a white paper, written by fossil fuel-funded contrarians Joseph D’Aleo and Craig Idso along with James Wallace III...Both papers are rife with flaws because they start from a desired conclusion – that the science underpinning Endangerment Finding is somehow wrong – and work backwards trying to support it. The paper itself has little scientific content. Using charts taken from climate denier blogs, the authors claim that every temperature record adjustment since the 1980s has been in the warming direction, which is simply false. As Zeke Hausfather pointed out, referencing work by Nick Stokes, roughly half of the adjustments have resulted in cooling and half in warming. Moreover, the net adjustment to the raw data actually reduces the long-term global warming trend."

Is it me or does it seem like this guy might be heavily invested in Solar and Wind energy? I guess oil and coal resurgence will cost him money. It would make sense
 

Ace_on_the_Turn

Sharpshooter
Joined
Jan 24, 2013
Messages
3,775
Reaction score
418
Location
OKC
Is it me or does it seem like this guy might be heavily invested in Solar and Wind energy? I guess oil and coal resurgence will cost him money. It would make sense

When you're wrong, you are really, really wrong. I spent 20 years working for Kerr-McGee (before Luke Corbett ran it into the ground). I own Devon and Chesapeake stock. I own six figures worth of Anadarko stock as a result of its buyout of Kerr-McGee. I've also invested in wind. Anyone who invest in the energy sector that does not own wind and\or solar is a piss-poor investor.

As for "oil and coal resurgence", you sound like you have zero idea what you are talking about. The simple fact is, we (the world) have the ability to produce more oil than the world demands. To be sure there will be more attempts to raise the price of oil, but as the prices rises, the supply will rise to easily meet the demand. There are billion and billions of barrels of oil that are not profitable to produce at $40, but let that hit $50 or $60 and the tap opens like a keg at a frat party. Most of the ME depends on oil and oil alone to finance their way of life. They simply cannot reduce production enough to move the market because other producers, like the U.S., can make up for any reduction with ease.

As for coal, coal has been dying a slow death for decades. It's not going to have a resurgence. No matter how many times Trump lies to coal miners.
 

tomthebaker

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Dec 23, 2006
Messages
2,109
Reaction score
579
Location
owasso-ish
They global warming scare mongers "adjust" actual temperature readings upwards. If anything, some need to be adjusted downwards, due to urbanization of the monitoring stations, which results in higher readings
 

lasher

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Mar 2, 2016
Messages
2,458
Reaction score
1,828
Location
oklahoma
They global warming scare mongers "adjust" actual temperature readings upwards. If anything, some need to be adjusted downwards, due to urbanization of the monitoring stations, which results in higher readings

no kidding, all this concrete and asphalt has to make the area hotter, i watch the storms (many of them) come in on radar, seems a hole in the squall line opens for the okc,edmond area. i've often wondered if the heat from the city streets and building deflect the storms and cause those holes in the radar image
 

John6185

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Oct 27, 2012
Messages
9,404
Reaction score
9,761
Location
OKC
If it weren't for "Global Warming," the democrats would come up with something else. Just be prepared to question what the come up with-it's usually something designed to take money out of your family's budget and needs.
 

emapples

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Apr 14, 2010
Messages
4,661
Reaction score
3,939
Location
Arrow Repaired
When you're wrong, you are really, really wrong. I spent 20 years working for Kerr-McGee (before Luke Corbett ran it into the ground). I own Devon and Chesapeake stock. I own six figures worth of Anadarko stock as a result of its buyout of Kerr-McGee. I've also invested in wind. Anyone who invest in the energy sector that does not own wind and\or solar is a piss-poor investor.

As for "oil and coal resurgence", you sound like you have zero idea what you are talking about. The simple fact is, we (the world) have the ability to produce more oil than the world demands. To be sure there will be more attempts to raise the price of oil, but as the prices rises, the supply will rise to easily meet the demand. There are billion and billions of barrels of oil that are not profitable to produce at $40, but let that hit $50 or $60 and the tap opens like a keg at a frat party. Most of the ME depends on oil and oil alone to finance their way of life. They simply cannot reduce production enough to move the market because other producers, like the U.S., can make up for any reduction with ease.

As for coal, coal has been dying a slow death for decades. It's not going to have a resurgence. No matter how many times Trump lies to coal miners.

OOohhhhhh.....,Now I understand......your wealth is the source of your " I am better than anyone else " elitist attitude....... things make a lot more sense now
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom