US Special Forces Attacked CIA Server Farm In Germany In Server Seizure Operation, 5 Soldiers Killed

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

p238shooter

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Aug 16, 2012
Messages
3,680
Reaction score
2,877
Location
East of Tulsa
Donner, I do agree with your reply somewhat, but Oklahoma gun laws do not effect other states gun regulations in any way. The Texas case presented does affect every other state in the union.
 

donner

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Oct 22, 2005
Messages
5,860
Reaction score
2,054
Location
Oxford, MS
Donner, I do agree with your reply somewhat, but Oklahoma gun laws do not effect other states gun regulations in any way. The Texas case presented does affect every other state in the union.

you may think that but that doesn’t mean it’d stop states from bringing suit. We’ve already seen cities claim that loose gun laws in southern states are letting guns flow into cities like Chicago. Or perhaps claims about environmental policies affect climate change. Or again, a blue state suing a red state over redistricting because of the threat to the balance of power in the house.

Texas is asking the court to invalidate elections in other states. That is not something the court will take lightly is my point. Some of the justices may want to help trump, but they are smart people and know their actions will have rippling effects.

I’m not saying these things will happen, specifically, just that the justices are likely aware of the politics around the case as well as what a decision like this could mean for the court going forward.
 
Last edited:

ignerntbend

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Mar 27, 2009
Messages
15,797
Reaction score
3,270
Location
Oklahoma
Something is happening. You should think of the Supreme Court as that girl in high school that always gave you the blue balls. The Supreme Court doesn't mean to be cruel. That's just the way she is.
 
Last edited:

donner

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Oct 22, 2005
Messages
5,860
Reaction score
2,054
Location
Oxford, MS
17 states have now joined in the TX lawsuit.
Its progress by numbers. Come on @SMS tell me again how nothing is happening

17 states (via their Republican Attorneys general and i think one solicitor general) filed a brief in support of Texas, but it may not matter how many states sign on since it will still rest on the legal questions the Texas case raises. The 29 other states could file in support of the four defendant states and it wouldn't change the standing of the case either.

This effort may go somewhere, or it may stop suddenly like the PA rep's case did a few days ago. We will see how fast, or slow, the court moves after it's filing deadline today.
 

donner

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Oct 22, 2005
Messages
5,860
Reaction score
2,054
Location
Oxford, MS
I'm starting to think Sidney Powell was hired by the dems to demoralize the anti-biden (notice I didn't say Trump supporters) crowd.

The Kraken failed again last night. This time in Wisconsin. The judge makes some interesting points about the filing that definitely make you wonder what the plaintiffs were thinking.

At one point, the judge points out the filing quotes from another case (Swaffer) in support of the plaintiff's position. Only that quote doesn't exist and the case it pointed to didn't deal with electors at all.

"And the plaintiff seems to have made up the “quote” in his brief that purports to be from Swaffer"... "The court has read page 4 of Swaffer—a decision by this court’s colleague, Judge J.P. Stadtmueller—three times and cannot find these words."

And in another section regarding the request to stop the counting and prohibit certification... 'The plaintiff asks the court to prohibit from occurring an event that has already occurred. An event that happened the day before he filed this lawsuit and nine days before the court issues this order.'

But perhaps the most crazy thing was when Powell told the court it wanted to keep the name of it's star witness secret, even from the defense. But, in filing their PDF, they failed to fully redact the person's name...
 

CHenry

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
21,147
Reaction score
12,652
Location
Under your bed
17 states (via their Republican Attorneys general and i think one solicitor general) filed a brief in support of Texas, but it may not matter how many states sign on since it will still rest on the legal questions the Texas case raises. The 29 other states could file in support of the four defendant states and it wouldn't change the standing of the case either.

This effort may go somewhere, or it may stop suddenly like the PA rep's case did a few days ago. We will see how fast, or slow, the court moves after it's filing deadline today.
Awesome info capt' obviouse lol
 

chuter

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Aug 19, 2010
Messages
5,268
Reaction score
7,637
Location
over yonder
The Kraken failed again last night. This time in Wisconsin. The judge makes some interesting points about the filing that definitely make you wonder what the plaintiffs were thinking.

At one point, the judge points out the filing quotes from another case (Swaffer) in support of the plaintiff's position. Only that quote doesn't exist and the case it pointed to didn't deal with electors at all.

"And the plaintiff seems to have made up the “quote” in his brief that purports to be from Swaffer"... "The court has read page 4 of Swaffer—a decision by this court’s colleague, Judge J.P. Stadtmueller—three times and cannot find these words."

And in another section regarding the request to stop the counting and prohibit certification... 'The plaintiff asks the court to prohibit from occurring an event that has already occurred. An event that happened the day before he filed this lawsuit and nine days before the court issues this order.'

But perhaps the most crazy thing was when Powell told the court it wanted to keep the name of it's star witness secret, even from the defense. But, in filing their PDF, they failed to fully redact the person's name...

Yeah, that sounds like clown show level stuff. WTF is going on?
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom