Do you want a war? This is how you get a war.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

WoodsCraft

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Nov 18, 2022
Messages
1,365
Reaction score
2,602
Location
Oklahoma
The question should be: Who is NOT reporting on it? Answer is everyone on the tube. You have to go to alternate sources and google hides everything.
But, whatever, if it's not on foxnews or msnbc, it's not real, it's just conspiracy and bullsh*t. Until it becomes true, lol


Most Americans aren't going to dig for the news and are happy to be spoon fed the MSM narratives
 

TANSTAAFL

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
3,574
Reaction score
6,754
Location
Oklahoma City
The only positive to this whole thing, in my opinion, is Russia losing the bulk of their main tanks and a bunch of aircraft.

And, yes... The government of Ukraine is very corrupt. Almost as corrupt as ours.
If russia was losing there would be no reason to send Tanks, more money or escalating this. We are being lied to.
 
Last edited:

JEVapa

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Banned Supporter
Joined
Aug 13, 2016
Messages
6,920
Reaction score
12,228
Location
Elgin/Cyril
Most Americans aren't going to dig for the news and are happy to be spoon fed the MSM narratives
This is true. Most "real" news now is all real or near real time videography and ad hoc reporting by various citizens and folks in all those places.
How many people here watch vs sh*t on Rebel News or OANN, Disclose, GWP, etc. Majority of folks discount or outright crap on sources that aren't any of the "bigs". They probably get the Sunday paper still too.
 

Dumpstick

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Dec 11, 2016
Messages
3,118
Reaction score
4,870
Location
Logan county, on a dirt road
I’m currently reading a book about Roosevelt and WW2. Prior to Pearl Harbor, Churchill wanted more and more and more from the Lend Lease program. There were many in the US who feared we would be defenseless if we gave as much military hardware as Churchill wanted.

Just an interesting parallel.
FDR spent a great deal of time and political effort to get us (the US) into WW2.

Lend/lease was a way around the US law that disallowed selling or giving any military hardware to any other country.

FDR stated that we weren't selling it or giving it away. We were lending some, and leasing out the rest.

Woodrow Wilson wanted the same in WW1. He even sent agents around the country to provoke hatred against Germany etc.


Damn Democrats. The most of the biggest wars we've had outside the country were started by democrats.
 

HillsideDesolate

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Nov 5, 2022
Messages
5,111
Reaction score
13,398
Location
Edmond
Saw this A.M. they now want F 16's
1673403382415319.jpg
 

SoonerP226

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Jan 1, 2013
Messages
13,527
Reaction score
14,066
Location
Norman
Saw this A.M. they now want F 16's
Some have advocated for sending them F-16s all along. Last year on his YouTube channel, CW “Mover” Lemoine, who used to be a Viper driver (and instructor, IIRC), discussed why that idea is a complete non-starter, no matter how many people wish it to be so. I think Ward Carroll (a former Naval aviator) has also touched on this on his YouTube channel.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom