So you're saying the state should pass a law making crumbling infrastructure illegal?
BTW, by your own logic, there is no "pee" on the toilet seat.
Wow, your circumlocution skills are impressive!
So you're saying the state should pass a law making crumbling infrastructure illegal?
BTW, by your own logic, there is no "pee" on the toilet seat.
Wow, your circumlocution skills are impressive!
I'm amazed at how many people are upset that they may fined for impeding the smooth flow of traffic.
You will never take away the power they wield on the road, NEVER!!! LOL
"Driving is not a right! But do not step on my driving rights!"
"Driving slower than surrounding traffic is more likely to cause an accident than speeding, according to research. Driving 5 mph slower than surrounding traffic is more likely to cause an accident than going 5 mph faster than drivers around you."
https://www.autoinsurancecenter.com/driving-slow-in-the-left-lane-is-dumb-and-illegal.htm
If you don't understand the logic behind why the roads are safer if slower cars stay to the right, this video might help.
...
Wow, your circumlocution skills are impressive!
Sometimes it takes a precise and complete essay to point out a fallacious claim based upon an absence of evidence. It's better than saying your statement sucks and you are wrong.
You said yourself that we need to wait until the evidence of such presents itself. Why would anyone be expected to produce your asked-for statistics(evidence) before any such statistics(evidence) exists? The truth is in the fact that a substantial fine will be laid and collected upon conviction of breaking the law. That is revenue generation. That is in the law. No "statistics" needed.
As to whether this law does actually save lives and/or help the flow of traffic remains to be seen. It will, without a doubt, at the very least, generate revenue when tickets are written.
Woody
Makes sense. I don’t left lane camp but
the logic that it “Forces faster drivers to make dangerous moves and pass on the right” is the presupposition I have issue with. “But Officer I was speeding and swerving through traffic because that guy was doing the speed limit in the left lane. It’s not my fault. I’m a victim.” Lol
Nobody is forcing anyone to make dangerous moves. They could just slow down, right? So saying that everyone needs to move over so speeders can speed in the left lane in the name of “safety” is kinda funny.
Why don’t we just crack down on speeding and unsafe “maneuvers”? Those are far less subjective than whether or not someone is “impeding” the left lane aren’t they?
Your getting it. This law is to help curb the dangers of aggressive drivers which we all know are a problem and cant all be stopped. The best way to avoid an aggressive driver accident is to GTFO of their way and let em get on down the road where maybe they will be picked up for speeding and driving dangerously.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
-
Oklahoma City 240rd 30-06 M2 HXP Spam Cans-Final Price Drop- Latest: Moparman485
-
-
Want To Buy Wanted to Buy Pre Lock Vintage or Older S&W Smith and Wesson Revolver- Latest: sushi & pistols
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-