“Forces faster drivers to make dangerous moves and pass on the right” is the presupposition I have issue with.
Nobody is forcing anyone to make dangerous moves. They could just slow down, right? So saying that everyone needs to move over so speeders can speed in the left lane in the name of “safety” is kinda funny.
Why don’t we just crack down on speeding and unsafe “maneuvers”? Those are far less subjective than whether or not someone is “impeding” the left lane.
If Im not mistaken, speeders are still being ticketed. The fact remains that driving slower in the left lane is illegal, disrupts traffic and ultimately makes the roads more dangerous than people speeding. I think it's kind of funny that people think because someone else is speeding (being unsafe), it justifies them making the roads even more unsafe by impeding traffic in the left lane. Nobody is forcing them not to drive in the right lane.
Both activities are against the law. Both are unsafe. One is statistically more unsafe than the other, yet the justification for doing it is that some don't understand the logic for why it's illegal. Huh? Talk about logic that is hard to follow.