Why is Omarosa not in jail?

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

dennishoddy

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2008
Messages
84,745
Reaction score
62,376
Location
Ponca City Ok
Folks, this is just the MSM delaying because they don’t have Trump news about Russian collusion.
The investigations with no end in sight with no guidelines other than to impeach Trump
 

TwoForFlinching

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Aug 14, 2012
Messages
10,428
Reaction score
5,651
Location
Lawton
Only if she's attempting to report waste, fraud or abuse to Congress or the Inspector General. A disgruntled ex-employee attempting to smear her former employer with salacious allegations, isn't covered under WPEA. Just sayin...

If, and I mean if, it proves discriminatory behavior, she should also be covered. Not saying she's not slandering, but if it proves out, she's in the clear for harrassment and possibly hostile work environment
 

Glocktogo

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jan 12, 2007
Messages
29,481
Reaction score
15,844
Location
Collinsville
If, and I mean if, it proves discriminatory behavior, she should also be covered. Not saying she's not slandering, but if it proves out, she's in the clear for harrassment and possibly hostile work environment

If so, there are specific requirements within the framework of the government to report those matters. By waiting as long as she did and publishing a book/speaking with the press rather than filing the proper reports, she failed to exercise her rights within the specified timeframes. Those requirements are always covered in exit interviews, such as the ones she taped in the Situation Room with the attorneys AFTER John Kelly walked out. You know, the portion of that recording the media refuses to air or discuss. :(
 

John6185

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Oct 27, 2012
Messages
9,384
Reaction score
9,720
Location
OKC
I can't figure out why those in charge in DC don't do a background check, she certainly should have had one as all of those who are entrusted within certain areas of the White House. Personally, I wouldn't have hired her even if she had passed a security check, her name is too close to someone else's. She very well could have been a plant, either that or she's nuts. Why would she record information unless she was gathering said info for a book or another entity? I think she's nuts.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom