And the taxpayer will get stuck with the bill.
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/09/the-environmental-fiasco-of-wind-energy.php
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/09/the-environmental-fiasco-of-wind-energy.php
That's great, I wonder what AOC thinks of this. Surely the green new deal has a plan.
I love how this blog, which profusely refutes climate change, casually tossed out that the concrete pads on which wind farms are built are bad for the environment because they off gas CO2 lmfao.
Maybe because it is true.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_impact_of_concrete
"The cement industry is one of the primary producers of carbon dioxide, a potent greenhouse gas."
My point being, if climate change is false, CO2 release is moot to their own belief. I just found it to be a humorous juxtaposition.
"Global warming is false, but concrete emits dangerous greenhouse gas" lol
"Global warming is false, but concrete emits dangerous greenhouse gas" lol
Powerline LOVES to point out the failed thinking of liberals and especially the "Green Energy" scam. Few years back they ran a few pieces on the environmental impact of the batteries for electric cars. Car would have to last for decades to offset the impact of making the batteries and shipping them here from China.
Why don't they make em of aluminum? It's a long piece of kit, but if planes can take the abuse... That'd at least make their service life longer and easier to recycle.
Agreed. We have plenty of experience of aluminum structures lasting 50+ years.
I wonder what's the limiting factor for the composite blades. (i.e. what causes it to expire after 20 yrs)
Similar threads
