Bloomberg Dismisses Texas Hero, Insists It Wasn’t His “Job” to Have a Gun or Decide to Shoot

swoklagunner · Jan 11, 2020

I'd love to ask Mr. Bloomberg if he were attending church in that building that morning and this incident broke out, would he have wanted to wait for police to arrive as this guy is shooting up the place? The ignorance of this man never ceases to amaze me.

OKNewshawk · Jan 12, 2020

swoklagunner said:
I'd love to ask Mr. Bloomberg if he were attending church in that building that morning and this incident broke out, would he have wanted to wait for police to arrive as this guy is shooting up the place? The ignorance of this man never ceases to amaze me.

He wouldn't have had to--he would have had his armed bodyguards to protect him. The rest of the congregation? He wouldn't give a second thought to 'em!

Chief Sapulpa · Jan 12, 2020

Gunbuffer said:
The shooter not Bloomberg u dipsh t

Thanks for the kind words...

ConstitutionCowboy · Jan 12, 2020

swoklagunner said:
I'd love to ask Mr. Bloomberg if he were attending church in that building that morning and this incident broke out, would he have wanted to wait for police to arrive as this guy is shooting up the place? The ignorance of this man never ceases to amaze me.

Only one piece of input: Bloomberg isn't ignorant. He is bent.

Woody

chuter · Jan 12, 2020

If he didn't have his money he'd be just another crazy person.

gerhard1 · Jan 12, 2020

chuter said:
If he didn't have his money he'd be just another crazy person.

Good point.

gerhard1 · Jan 12, 2020

ConstitutionCowboy said:
If you can't afford to eat out or hire a cook, you do your own cooking. If you can't afford armed guards to follow/surround you, you do your own guarding. I don't see a problem with guarding yourself. If Bloomberg can have his armed guards while walking the streets of New York City, any person ought to be able to walk armed on the streets of New York City. Bloomberg exhibits tyrannical behavior. I believe it is also despotic.

The people of New York are to blame for allowing this to stand.

If there is a different opinion to any of this, I'd like to hear it.

Woody

I'd say more hypocritical.

PJM · Jan 18, 2020

gerhard1 said:
I'd say more hypocritical.

Not hypocritical, tyrannical. He is trying to control our GOD given rights. This is not hypocritical, it is by very definition tyrannical and Despotic.
Tyranny
: oppressive power every form of tyranny over the mind of man— Thomas Jefferson especially : oppressive power exerted by government the tyranny of a police state
2a : a government in which absolute power is vested in a single ruler especially : one characteristic of an ancient Greek city-state
b : the office, authority, and administration of a tyrant
3 : a rigorous condition imposed by some outside agency or force living under the tyranny of the clock— Dixon Wecter
4 : an oppressive, harsh, or unjust act : a tyrannical act workers who had suffered tyrannies

Despotism
a: oppressive absolute (see absolute sense 2) power and authority exerted by government : rule by a despot an excess of law is despotism, from which free men revolt— S. B. Pettengill
b: oppressive or despotic exercise of power educational despotism
2a: a system of government in which the ruler has unlimited power : absolutism
b: a despotic state enduring the despotism of the czars

DSA/dnc IS the enemy. Want proof, just turn your TV on.

Bloomberg Dismisses Texas Hero, Insists It Wasn’t His “Job” to Have a Gun or Decide to Shoot

swoklagunner

Sharpshooter

OKNewshawk

Sharpshooter

Chief Sapulpa

Sharpshooter

ConstitutionCowboy

Sharpshooter

chuter

Sharpshooter

gerhard1

Sharpshooter

gerhard1

Sharpshooter

PJM

Sharpshooter

Similar threads

Latest posts

Bloomberg Dismisses Texas Hero, Insists It Wasn’t His “Job” to Have a Gun or Decide to Shoot

Sharpshooter

Sharpshooter

Sharpshooter

Sharpshooter

Sharpshooter

Sharpshooter

Sharpshooter

Sharpshooter

Similar threads

Join the conversation!

Join today and get all the highlights of this community direct to your inbox. It's FREE!