Civil War: Hypotheticals

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

TedKennedy

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
11,376
Reaction score
12,791
Location
Tulsa
I don't think the Constitution is supposed to 'prevent' anything'. IMHO it was a statement to world and England that the people on this land mass were forming a new country and a government over here and for England to FO because We The People were in charge over here, not them.

The Bill of Rights were a statement to the newly formed government about how this new government will be formed and what this government did not have the Right to do to the Citizens of the newly formed government.

The Prevention of anything is up to We The People.

"Shall not be..." that's designed to prevent. The Bill of Rights were added because of concerns that the constitution did not restrict government enough. If you look at the history of the ratification, you'll find plenty of politics, and big-government scumbags in there, just like it was 2020. The constitution and Bill of Rights is not some sacred document - it's a framework that was a compromise, and not nearly as good as the Articles of Confederation that preceded it.

The Bill of Rights was put in place to prevent what our government has become.
 

Louro

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Sep 26, 2014
Messages
2,467
Reaction score
2,155
Location
Lawton
Oh but they did have communications.
The politicians caused that defeat.
After the 2nd Tet offensive the VC and the NVA were destroyed as organized fighting units for the most part. Beat to a pulp, demoralized and disorganized as most of their leadership was killed or captured.
It was the perfect time militarily for the US to mount a counter attack to take out the remainder of the enemy but LBJ wouldn’t allow it to happen.
He was afraid of offending Hanoi.
The US had many opportunities to end that war and didn’t take advantage of them.

Did we made the same mistake during DESRT STORM?
 

Louro

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Sep 26, 2014
Messages
2,467
Reaction score
2,155
Location
Lawton
I wonder if, after our next "civil war" that historians will one day look back at the 19th, 20th and 21st centuries in North America and conclude that our problems leading to "civil war II" were set on a course determined before "civil war I"?

We certainly ceased to be a Republic in 1865, and with the failure of States to secede and govern themselves, it seems inevitable that we all become servants of an ever-growing central power. The constitution has not prevented our current state of affairs, simply slowed the acceleration of the growth.

This is a deep thought...…. Every great civilization has failed, humans are the most destructive creature that ever existed.
 

Dale00

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
May 28, 2006
Messages
7,462
Reaction score
3,868
Location
Oklahoma
There will be no civil war. The main players do not want a civil war....only a few fringe elements who shout a lot.
Main thing is not to celebrate too much publicly or insult the losers when Trump wins - there are too many unstable loons on the far left: do not trigger them....let them cool down.
 
Last edited:

Gideon

Formerly SirROFL
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jun 4, 2009
Messages
1,736
Reaction score
1,087
Location
Tulsa
"Civil War" implies competing elites vying for institutional power. In the West, our elites are generally in agreement that you and I have to be suppressed and eliminated so we can be replaced. There may be violence at the street level, but that's just part and parcel of anarcho-tyranny.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom