While it is tempting to interpret 21-1290-22 as only rights and that violation of that is merely trespassing, I for one don't want to be the one that becomes a test case to "set precedent". Both "Trespassing" and "Unlawful Concealed Carry" are both misdemeanors, but I don't care to be arrested for either.
As for following the advise of SDA instructors, with all due respect, they are not necessarily required to be lawyers to be instructors. I also believe that a LEO does have the option of arresting an individual under either of the above stated laws if they find someone carrying in a posted business or other property that is posted.
Once an arrest is made, then the DA's office has the option to proceed with charges with either violation. At that point, it again becomes the decision of a lawyer, not an SDA instructor or LEO. So, unless someone comes on the forum and gives opinion as an attorney or judge, I'm not going to follow the conjecture of forum posters who want to interpret the law themselves.
I don't ever recall seeing a posting on this, or any other forum, where an attorney or judge has clarified the statute of 21-1290-22. However, after my vacation here is over, I will try to get clarification from a couple of different attorneys that I know.
As for following the advise of SDA instructors, with all due respect, they are not necessarily required to be lawyers to be instructors. I also believe that a LEO does have the option of arresting an individual under either of the above stated laws if they find someone carrying in a posted business or other property that is posted.
Once an arrest is made, then the DA's office has the option to proceed with charges with either violation. At that point, it again becomes the decision of a lawyer, not an SDA instructor or LEO. So, unless someone comes on the forum and gives opinion as an attorney or judge, I'm not going to follow the conjecture of forum posters who want to interpret the law themselves.
I don't ever recall seeing a posting on this, or any other forum, where an attorney or judge has clarified the statute of 21-1290-22. However, after my vacation here is over, I will try to get clarification from a couple of different attorneys that I know.
